My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-14-2016 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
11-14-2016 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2016 11:41:16 AM
Creation date
12/14/2016 11:40:08 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 14, 2016 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />10. CSAH 112 TRAIL AND PARCEL EXTENSION <br />McMillan stated the advantage to it is that it creates a looped trail system and the north end of Orono <br />would be getting a great trail system if approved. McMillan noted in order for Orono to do this trail on <br />their own, it would cost around $400,000 and that they would basically be getting the trail for a fourth of <br />the cost. McMillan stated in her view it is a nice amenity with a huge cost savings. <br />Walsh commented the trail is definitely a draw for the community and the only concern he had is what the <br />residents think about the trail. Walsh stated he did attend the open house but there were no residents there <br />at that time. Walsh indicated he spoke to a couple of the residents when he visited the area and that it <br />would be helpful to have Hennepin County place some stakes showing where the trail will be. Walsh <br />noted the property owner at 970 Wayzata Boulevard had no issue with the trail and the other two residents <br />were not home and he did not have a chance to meet with them. <br />Mayor McMillan asked if any residents would like to comment on this item <br />Kent Cassidy stated he did attend the open house and at the time he did not vote against it. Cassidy stated <br />they were not told what the impact would be to their property. Cassidy stated over the weekend they went <br />out and measured it and they realized that from the arbor in the back of their yard to the edge of the <br />pavement is 15 feet. Cassidy indicated they are concerned about privacy along there. Cassidy noted their <br />back yard has been featured in a couple of magazines, they have had some weddings back there, and the <br />Minnesota Arboretum has toured their property a couple of times. Cassidy stated they also have a pool in <br />the back and that they have some concerns with safety given the pool. Cassidy stated they currently are <br />very secluded and no one really knows there is a pool. Cassidy noted there currently is no fencing around <br />the pool. <br />Cassidy stated from the information they have been given, which is not a lot, he and his wife feel it will <br />have a big impact on the way they enjoy their property and the value of their property. Cassidy stated <br />they also recently installed an invisible fence for their dog which will probably have to be torn out. <br />McMillan asked if anyone from Hennepin County talked to them at the open house. <br />Cassidy stated they did not really speak to anyone from the County. Cassidy indicated they were gone for <br />a week during this time frame and that they were thankful they found out about tonight's meeting so they <br />could appear here. Cassidy stated they definitely are against it right now. <br />McMillan noted Hennepin County will be here at the Orono City Hall at 8:00 a.m. Thursday morning and <br />that he is welcome to stop by at that time. McMillan stated he could also leave his address and contact <br />information with the Public Works Director so he can pass it along to Hennepin County. McMillan stated <br />it is her belief that most of the trail is going within the right-of-way. <br />Edwards stated all of the road and trail improvements are planned for within the right-of-way but there <br />are some portions where the runouts for grade will go into existing private property and will result in the <br />County needing to obtain the necessary casements to perform that work. <br />Page 10 of 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.