,
<br /> �` LEGEND REVISIONS
<br /> MISC.REVISIONS
<br /> 10-17-11 JML
<br /> ���� . � MISC.REVISIONS
<br /> �o DENOTES RETAINING WALL $ DENOTES SANITARY MA ,o-ze-„aM�
<br /> CITY COMMENTS
<br /> 30 15 0 15 30 60 � � DENOTES ITYDRANT REVISIONS 10-31-11 JML
<br /> TW DENOTE. TOP OF RETAINING WALL FouNoaTiotinse�i�r
<br /> 11-21-11 DBP
<br /> c DENOTES CATCH BASIN REVISEOPERCITY
<br /> SCALE IN FEET BW DENOTE. BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALL � COMMENTS 12-20-11 DBP
<br /> � 1 aE��Eo sEoewA K o�ze-�z.nu�
<br /> �A` �� I OO DENOTES STORM MANHOLE
<br /> �V
<br /> / CjO� � City of Orono I � DENOTES STORM APRON
<br /> � �Np p,L Planning&Zoning Plan �ev�,��W p DENOTES IRON MONUMENT U o
<br /> G� 004.4 �� �
<br /> . O 1 SitE Pian Review Date: I -3 �� { , DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION NORTH z �
<br /> `� � 6'�� I �. PRROVEn I (000.0) DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION � �
<br /> 1 �
<br /> �G`_�Dc� �Q 1004.5� 1006.4 ` ❑qF�ROVED WITH F.E ISILNS (see notes) -�-- DENOTES DIRECTION OF SURFACE DRAINAGE � �
<br /> \ G G�1�p�0 Fp 4.6 p DENI�ED Y � Z
<br /> \ ���� G J 1 4.8 /���8 � pOp.O DENOTES SANITARY SEWER SERVICE ELEVATION � �
<br /> i 1nn �y
<br /> J�1004.4 �0 7' �� h B 4 9 9 `� y,�;,�� Staff: __��V V 4���� I � �
<br /> / � 1 0 0 4.9 � P I D EN OTES PINE TREE A SH D E N O T E S A S H T R E E � '�
<br /> 5.0 1005•� '� �`� / a
<br /> � \ 1008.0 � S -��5'Z� �\ � I T V B D E N O T E S C A B L E T V B O X T B D E N O T E S T E L E PH ONE BOX W 3
<br /> BENCHMARKA T N 1 0 0 5.7 1 0 0 �s k � � 3 �%1000.1 m Q
<br /> � 7NHELEV.=fAGiB.QS "' . 1 .57 W 3
<br /> 1006.1 0 1005.2 ,� 5'1 �'� ��p s '``•�`9� �6I'3 � 999�1 I -- - - - DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOUR � o
<br /> t 0 5.0 L S ' 1 .8 n� 10 0�4 � 8 ��., • 9 9 8.1 •1 9 9 9.1 = m
<br /> � • 005.0"� \ `�pa,9 1006 38 �oos� � Q` � NOTES:
<br /> a' � i � � �
<br /> u, 5 TB � 3�• a� j i • �� I� � I 1.)EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. Q �
<br /> � � �61� N � �49 pG� w / � � 999�4 � 8 4�` THE CONTRACTOR SHAL�DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND (n �
<br /> alSA�2 �� � �8 40 �P o6y� 1�UO2.6 � �9g � - I ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE
<br /> 1004,g . 6 �g 0 l�0 �'J•� � 8� / ; I FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF HIS ,�oRs Sb�
<br /> 1004.82 OS#4 �x � • . FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING �`` �i6
<br /> 1004.6 Z • ,���i' S� � �pV'� ��,�j OO�k.�` /��.C`„999.06 � ' 9 7.9 UTILITIES. N «- b
<br /> �
<br /> ,p � �6 p,L r10 ,�' , i � j a, � . 998.9
<br /> . Q$� � 1004.6�N �,E� � '�� 0 � ;
<br /> � I X ��\; � 2�`L O�L qF� G,�� �y � � 2.)MUST MAINTAIN A MINIMUM 2%SI.OPE GRADIENT TO ACCOMMODATE d"'�1, �v`t"
<br /> 1004.2,�' � � � �+ G/ �g�,1 97•6� �/ POSITIVE DRAINAGE. �v3 oEs
<br /> 251004.j i�9 98.9 BW j 9�8.1 9�/16
<br /> / /:
<br /> t� '� �1 � 'c�- g98 q�y y 99 •9 / � % �P �16� 3.)ALL OFFSET IRONS ARE MEASURED TO HUNDREDTHS OF A F00T AND
<br /> 1002.6� � � �0 2 �d�,,� \ / �,� CAN BE USED AS BENCHMARKS.
<br /> � , 1002-- _„ �0� ,�`','.':''`y / � PI 16 �� Z
<br /> I .f��.�• �J
<br /> � � -�p�� �-iJ-_t5� gV1// � ��'J� j �8•2 + ��997•3 \ O 4.)THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY SHOWN IS CONCEPTUAL ONLY AND DOES
<br /> / Q'�pp� / l9� � P� �Z � NOT PURPORT TO SHOW EXACTLY HOW THE DRIVEWAY SHALL BE BUILT.
<br /> � r 99B � ���,�7� ' 998.4 ' �. � � 99Q.4�.F,� 993. = W
<br /> �7•8 � g 4 � __ .._ __+r � ' ~ / J �p.�' 996�9 SH 5.)A TITLE OPINION WAS NOT FURNISHED TO THE SURVEYOR. F- � � w Q
<br /> � � � 9 7.8 � � • 997.8 996,� - - y J � W Z �
<br /> 0
<br /> � • 996.2 g o� � /� J������ 99� � 6.)PROPOSED GRADES SHOWN ADJACENT TO BUILDING FOUNDATION � � � ¢ W
<br /> � -�g96 _ .I 997.0 r. � 995.A" PI 12 997. m � � w z
<br /> `_"" �I 70 �� �6'0 .��Y � � REFERS TO TOP OF BLACK DIRT. � � � Q O Z
<br /> / - - -- �T9�" �P ,c Q o = U
<br /> �
<br /> �� � � � 9s �p,� 6' 996.9 7.)BENCHMARK: Z � W w p
<br /> . 994� 994'B - �99J4S� � � c � �F� 12 MNDOT GEODETIC STATION#81489-MONUMENT IN BRIDGE SIDEWALK IN � W ¢ � ¢ O
<br /> i � /� 994.7 J � SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WILLOW DRIVE. Q Q � Q Z �
<br /> w �
<br /> _ __ __ __ __ __ __ • 995.0 ELEVATION=1012.81 (NAVD88) Z � a = � �
<br /> ' • 994.5 �
<br /> • 994.5 N89�2� �����W � �J4.�� • 994.8 � � � N v
<br /> DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATA - WO I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION w m
<br /> OF A SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF: ()
<br /> GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION =1005.5 OFFSET IRONS
<br /> BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION =997.0 ELEVATIONS ARE TO THE TOP OF PIPE LOT 5,BLOCK 1,GLENDALE COVE,ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT
<br /> PROPOSED ELEVATIONS os#,=,00,.s6 OS#3=1003.57
<br /> HARDCi�VER THEREOF,HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA
<br /> os#2=1ooa.82 OS#4=999.06 LOT AREA= 18,278.3 S.F. AND THE PROPOSED BUILDING TO BE CONSTRUCTED AND OTHER
<br /> PROPOSED GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION = 1006.50
<br /> PROPOSED TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATION=1006.83 HOUSE AREA= 1,854 S.F. IMPROVEMENTS AS PROVIDED TO ME THIS 29 DAY OF SEPTEMBER,2011. DRAW/CHECK
<br /> PROPOSED BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION =998.16 DRIVEWAY AREA=926 S.F.
<br /> JML/DBP
<br /> SIDEWALK AREA=80 S.F. DATE
<br /> SETBACKS STOOP ARE6�=148 S.F. 09-26-11
<br /> ASBUILT ELEVATIONS MIN. FRONT YARD SETBACK=30' ` � ^_ BOO N/�PAGE
<br /> ASBUILT GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION = 1006.05+0.33= 1006.38 NOT POURED MIN. SIDE YARD SETBACK=10', 10' TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA=3,008 S.F. rN.+�
<br /> ASBUILT TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATION=1006.73
<br /> � � MIN. REAR YARD SETBACK=30' JOB NO.
<br /> ASBUILT BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION =998.07 COVERAGE= 16.5% David B. Pemberton, Licensed Land Surveyor 3568-018
<br /> Minnesota License No. 40344 DWG. NAME
<br /> Floor Area Rat:o:0.248 CERT 3568-018
<br />
|