My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-23-2015 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2015
>
02-23-2015 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2015 10:47:02 AM
Creation date
3/12/2015 10:46:41 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 23, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 9 of 19 <br /> <br />3. #15-3707 – AMEND SECTION 78-1405(a)(5) CLARIFY RETAINING WALL AND <br />LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE SETBACKS – ORDINANCE NO. 139 (continued) <br /> <br />McMillan asked if Staff sees five feet as a problem. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the Code talks about what is considered a public road and that prohibition of items within <br />the dedicated right-of-way or ten feet on either side of a paved road has been in the Code for decades. <br />Gaffron stated he is not sure if five feet is better but that there might not be sufficient room to park a car <br />on the side of the road if there is only five feet. Gaffron stated Staff will not require something be <br />removed if it has existed for some period of time and is not currently an issue, but that this would prevent <br />it from happening in the future. <br /> <br />Edwards stated Staff will look at a plan to see what materials are being proposed for use and to determine <br />the type of impact it will have if a vehicle hits it or if there is a utility located underneath it. Edwards <br />stated nine times out of ten it may not be a problem, but that the ordinance at least gives Staff the <br />opportunity to review it before it is put in that area. <br /> <br />McMillan stated something should be included in the City’s newsletter about right-of-ways and what is <br />allowed in that area. McMillan noted the City has received questions from people about whether they are <br />required to fix culverts. <br /> <br />Printup indicated he is okay with the ten feet since it has been on the City’s books for decades but that he <br />is struggling with requiring the five feet on small lots, especially if they are only talking about a 2-foot <br />flower bed. <br /> <br />McMillan indicated she is okay with 20 cubic yards. <br /> <br />Printup stated he would also be okay with the 20 cubic yards. <br /> <br />Walsh stated he can live with the 10 feet in the front yard but that he has an issue with the five feet for the <br />side yards since it really limits the ability of someone to utilize their land if they have a small lot. <br /> <br />Mayor McMillan asked for public comments. <br /> <br />There were no public comments regarding this item. <br /> <br />Levang moved, Printup seconded, to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 139, Third Series, an Ordinance <br />Amending Section 78-1405 of the Orono Zoning Code Regarding Retaining Wall and Landscape <br />Structures as a Non-encroachment, subject to revising the ordinance to reflect 20 cubic yards <br />rather than 10 cubic yards. <br /> <br />Printup asked if she would entertain two feet from a lot line. <br /> <br />Levang stated she would stick with the five feet. <br /> <br />McMillan stated given the possible drainage issues, it should probably be left at five feet. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.