My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-08-2014 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
12-08-2014 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2015 10:46:07 AM
Creation date
3/12/2015 10:45:37 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, December 8, 2014 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 23 of 26 <br /> <br />(23. FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS, Continued) <br /> <br />Bremer stated this has been done before in Orono but that it is a philosophical question. Bremer stated in <br />her view Orono should be competitive and that they should compensate these individuals for who they are <br />and what they bring to this role. <br /> <br />Cornick stated everyone knows that insurance companies raise their premiums periodically, and asked <br />what it would cost in 2016. Cornick asked whether the City can limit it in some respect in the future <br />since that is kind of an unknown area going into the future. <br /> <br />McMillan stated medical care has become expensive and that the City-paid premium part has increased <br />over the years. McMillan stated that has been a good effort on the part of the City and that maybe that in <br />itself is a good enough effort. <br /> <br />Printup stated he is not comfortable or able to make a decision tonight when they are talking about <br />$20,000 for compensation adjustments for two individuals and $15,000 for the amendments. <br /> <br />Levang moved to table Item No. 23, amendment to employment agreements, to the February City <br />Council work session. <br /> <br />McMillan stated in her view the City Council can discuss this at a future work session and that it does not <br />necessarily need to be discussed in February. <br /> <br />Mattick stated given the nature of the request, it would be preferable to have a set date for when it will be <br />discussed again so it will not be so staff driven. <br /> <br />Levang indicated she would prefer to discuss it at a work session. <br /> <br />Printup stated he would prefer to discuss it during the budget talks for 2016 and that in his view the <br />amendment has come too late this year. <br /> <br />Levang indicated she would prefer to discuss it at a work session, and asked when the budget discussions <br />typically start. <br /> <br />Olson stated they typically start in late May, early June. <br /> <br />Printup stated he does not want to give a false impression that the City Council is going to talk about this <br />and make a decision in February. <br /> <br />Bremer stated if the City Council is looking for cost of insurance and other variables, Staff should be <br />directed to obtain that information. <br /> <br />Levang stated she wants to be respectful to the City Administrator Loftus and Police Chief Farniok about <br />not pushing this out too indefinitely. Levang indicated she would prefer that it put it on the February <br />work session agenda and that the City Council can determine where they go from there. Levang stated in <br />the mean time the City Council could ask the City Administrator for additional information. Levang <br />stated the chart that was provided was helpful and the City Council could review that again. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.