My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-08-2014 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
12-08-2014 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2015 10:46:07 AM
Creation date
3/12/2015 10:45:37 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, December 8, 2014 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 20 of 26 <br /> <br />(22. 2015 NON-UNION EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION ADJUSTMENTS – RESOLUTION NO. <br />6479, Continued) <br /> <br />Bremer stated she would encourage the City Council approve the 2.5 percent increase with a pledge <br />commitment on the part of the City Council to get assistance to analyze the appropriate pay brackets for <br />each job and the competitive nature of the pay scale. Bremer stated if one of the concerns is that the pay <br />ranges are getting out of line as compared to the rest of the market, the City Council should have that <br />data. <br /> <br />McMillan noted the City is not talking about cutting wages but rather stabilizing the wages going into the <br />future. McMillan stated in her view Orono has the right mixture of employees but that they also need to <br />do some other projects as the tax base grows that the citizens want the City to do that have been deferred. <br />McMillan stated the budget is a balancing act and that it needs to be sustainable for the City going <br />forward. <br /> <br />Levang indicated she is in agreement with Mayor McMillan. Levang asked if a decision needs to be <br />made tonight and what the ramifications would be if it is not approved tonight. <br /> <br />Mattick noted typically the City’s raises have taken effect January 1. Mattick stated the Attorney General <br />has issued an opinion on retroactive payments and that a collective bargaining agreement can account for <br />retroactive payments if the City is in the process of negotiating with the bargaining unions. Mattick <br />stated the City does not have the same ability to do the retroactive payment with non-union employees <br />and that the Attorney General has said that that payment essentially amounts to a bonus or a gift. Mattick <br />stated if the Council is looking to have the rate go into effect January 1, the decision needs to be made <br />tonight. <br /> <br />Loftus stated what would happen on January 1 is the employees would actually revert to 2013 wages. <br />The resolution adopted last year was explicit and said at the end of 2014 the lump sum goes away, which <br />has been accommodated for in the budget. Loftus stated it would not be status quo come January 1 and <br />that the employees would revert back to their 2013 wages. <br /> <br />McMillan stated if there was a hybrid that totals 2.5 percent, she would be willing to consider that. <br />Bremer suggested 1.5 percent COLA and 1 percent lump sum. <br /> <br />Printup stated it would be a disservice to everybody if the Council did not approve something tonight. <br /> <br />Levang stated what the Council is leaning towards is having a total of 2.5 percent but part of that would <br />be a lump sum and part would be COLA. <br /> <br />Loftus stated her preference would be that the 1.5 percent be the COLA since it would allow the 2014 <br />wages to continue and not revert back to 2013 wages. <br /> <br />Printup stated he is comfortable with that. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.