Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />November 10, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />  Page 11 of 31  <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />(5. #14-3690 FRED JOHNSON (C/D PURCHASER), PATRICIA PFEFFER (SELLER), 1565 <br />ORCHARD BEACH PLACE – VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Continued) <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated findings for denial are included in Staff’s report. Staff is recommending denial of all of <br />the variances and conditional use permit and is looking for Council’s direction on whether they would <br />grant any approvals for this property. Gaffron indicated Staff could bring back a resolution at the next <br />meeting based on the Council’s recommendations. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if 10’ x 40’ is the exact shape of the building envelope. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated it is approximate and that it likely would be 34.3’ by 14’ on one end and nine feet on <br />the other. Gaffron stated a 10’ x 35’ building envelope is perhaps a more realistic expectation. <br /> <br />Levang asked if the building envelope is what is pictured on the overhead. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated it would be the building envelope with no setback variances being granted. <br /> <br />Levang asked how many square feet the footprint of the structure would be. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated it would be roughly 350 feet. <br /> <br />Levang asked if the Council were to look at some of the other options, such as lot area and setback <br />variances, what would occur then. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated if the Council were to allow 30 feet instead of 35 feet at the street, it would give the <br />applicant an extra ten feet and increase the building envelope to approximately 20’ x 40’ or 800 square <br />feet. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if there were any changes or if Staff is presenting the same information reviewed on <br />October 13. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated nothing has changed and no new information has been submitted by the applicants. <br />Gaffron noted the City has received some letters from the neighbors. <br /> <br />Levang asked if the house plans are actual or proposed. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the house plans are to scale and appears to be what the applicants are proposing. Gaffron <br />stated in his view the plans correctly depict the size and shape of the proposed building. <br /> <br />Todd Haugan, Attorney-at-Law, stated it appears some progress is being made if he heard correctly that <br />two or three of the variances may be granted. Currently the proposed building envelope is 10’ x 40’ and <br />that they are asking for it be increased to 10’ x 40’ x 22’ on one side and 26 feet on the other. Haugan <br />stated they are 12 feet short on one side and 16 feet short on the other. <br /> <br />Haugan stated if you look at the graph created by Staff, there is an existing garage slab on the right that <br />abuts the street. Haugan noted their proposal is nowhere near the street compared to the house that used <br />to be there. If you look at the original house and garage, the house was closer to the back lot line than