My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-13-2014 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
10-13-2014 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2015 2:34:26 PM
Creation date
3/5/2015 2:34:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 13, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 9 of 21 <br />(8. #14-3690 TONKA LAKE PROPERTIES, LLC, 1565 ORCHARD BEACH PLACE (PID <br />07-117-23-43-0026), VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Continued) <br /> <br />5. Average lakeshore setback variance to allow the proposed residence to be located 75 feet from <br /> the lakeshore, an encroachment of approximately 50 feet lakeward of the average setback line <br /> defined by the adjacent residence at 1555 Orchard Beach Place. <br /> <br />6. Conditional use permit and variance required for 0-75 foot grading/filling/excavating in excess of <br /> ten cubic yards. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission reviewed the application at their September meeting and voted unanimously to <br />recommend denial of the variances and conditional use permit. <br /> <br />Gaffron noted this application is virtually identical to an application that was before the City Council <br />approximately one year ago, which was denied. The average lakeshore setback variance is one of the key <br />elements that cannot be met. City Code would allow an administrative variance in a situation like this if <br />the neighbors were in support of the application and they have indicated they are not. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated one of the questions that did come up at the Planning Commission meeting was a question <br />by the applicants’ attorney about reasonable uses of the property if it cannot be built on. Potential uses of <br />the property consist of a garden type use and other possible uses. Gaffron stated absent all of the other <br />setback issues except for the average setback, there is a buildable envelope approximately ten feet deep <br />and 40 feet long. Gaffron stated he is not sure whether that would be considered a principal residence <br />structure but that there would still be the average setback issue. <br /> <br />Staff has provided a number of findings for denial of the application and they include the following: <br /> <br />1. The property does not meet the criteria established by state statute and City Code to be deemed <br /> buildable without variances being granted. <br /> <br />2. The City is not obligated to grant variances to allow this property to be buildable. <br /> <br />3. The fact that a summer home existed on the property many decades ago does not provide an <br /> inherent right to build a home on the property. <br /> <br />4. The parcel has historically been assessed at a valuation significantly below that of a buildable <br /> site. <br /> <br />5. In past actions the City has generally denied lot area variances for vacant lots of less than 10,000 <br /> square feet. <br /> <br />6. The original plat designation as “Commons” strongly suggests that this site was originally platted <br /> as a neighborhood amenity rather than as an individual building site. <br /> <br />7. Development on this lot potentially could obstruct lake views of the adjacent owner. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.