My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-25-2014 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
08-25-2014 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2015 2:32:28 PM
Creation date
3/5/2015 2:32:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 25, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 2 of 18 <br /> <br />4. #13-3638/39 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LAKEVIEW PROPERTY, 405 NORTH ARM <br />DRIVE – LAKEVIEW EAW COMMENTS REVIEW <br /> <br />Pat Hiller, Source Land; and Bob Kermis, NAC, were present. <br /> <br />Kermis stated the comment period for the Lakeview EAW closed on August 6. A total of 12 comment <br />letters were received and were comprised of a mixture of letters from various agencies and area residents. <br />Those specific comments are provided in the cover sheet contained within the City Council’s packet. The <br />majority of the comments are related to items that will be addressed as part of the preliminary plat or PRD <br />application process. <br /> <br />Kermis noted there were some comments that will require some additional information to complete the <br />EAW and the first item is related to the avian survey. The DNR has requested some additional detail <br />regarding the survey. Staff is working with the applicant and also discussing the issue with the DNR to <br />clarify exactly what is needed and what will be acceptable to the DNR. <br /> <br />Kermis noted, the second item is the archeological survey. A couple of the letters indicated that there is <br />some incompleteness. Kermis indicated this work is underway in order to respond to the received <br />comments. The third item related to some comments from area residents regarding the traffic study and <br />some impacts that they felt were not sufficiently addressed. Kermis stated it is his understanding work on <br />that item is also currently underway and is nearing completion. <br /> <br />Kermis stated ultimately the charge of the City Council will be to determine whether or not an EIS is <br />required for this particular project. Considering that there are some outstanding issues or additional <br />information that has been requested, Staff is recommending that that determination not be made tonight <br />but rather after that information is received and Staff has had an opportunity to review it. <br /> <br />McMillan asked whether the City Council should comment on the information they have received in their <br />packet. <br /> <br />Kermis stated it is Staff’s recommendation to have all of the comments received so there is a complete <br />package to bring before the City Council and then continue the matter. It is Staff’s intention to <br />thoroughly examine the material and then provide a detailed report to the City Council. <br /> <br />McMillan stated she is delighted to see the avian survey and that it is the first time she has seen that <br />included in an EAW. McMillan stated one of the comments that she would like to make regarding that <br />item is that this development has a conservation design component to it and that she would like to ensure <br />the prospective homeowners are provided information on that to make them aware of that fact. McMillan <br />stated the philosophy of the development that has been discussed so far are the inclusion of conservation <br />areas, natural drainage areas, and natural wildlife corridors, and that she would like to make sure that that <br />information is provided to the homeowners. <br /> <br />Kermis stated he is not that familiar with Orono’s Planned Residential Development process; but <br />assuming that it is similar to a PUD process, the City has the ability to impose any sort of conservation <br />related standards it deems appropriate. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.