My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-23-2014 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2014
>
06-23-2014 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2015 2:29:48 PM
Creation date
3/5/2015 2:29:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />Monday, June 23, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> Page 26 of 30 <br /> <br />(8. 14-3666 LUKE KUJAWA ON BEHALF OF EOF INVESTMENTS, LLC, 1440-1442 <br />SHORELINE DRIVE – REZONING, Continued) <br /> <br />Mattick stated his understanding is that the Planning Commission could not find the right fix for these <br />properties and that they felt the idea of a sub district may be the way to go. Mattick stated the Planning <br />Commission wanted to get the input of the City Council on that matter and that the Planning Commission <br />can take the City Council’s comments into consideration regardless if the applicant pursues the rezoning <br />application or a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. <br /> <br />Timothy Keane stated since a zoning amendment to commercial is not possible until a Comprehensive <br />Plan issues have been addressed and since the clock is ticking on the application, the City Council may <br />want to deny the application since the applicant has chosen not to withdraw it to avoid running up against <br />the time limit. Keane stated the zoning application cannot move forward without a Comprehensive Plan <br />Amendment. <br /> <br />Mattick noted the City still has time to make that determination but that he doesn’t disagree in terms of <br />what should happen first. Mattick stated the rezoning application can either be withdrawn or an extension <br />can be granted. <br /> <br />Kujawa stated he is somewhat confused on the process and that he would like it clarified at some point. <br /> <br />McMillan indicated Staff can provide clarification. <br /> <br />Kujawa noted he heard a recommendation that one of the residential lots remain residential, and asked <br />whether that would still require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and withdrawing the current <br />application. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the applicant has the option of withdrawing the application or having the application <br />denied. Gaffron stated if the application is denied, he would technically have to wait six months before <br />submitting a new application on the rezoning. <br /> <br />Mattick stated the applicant could also extend the time line. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the City is not able to take final action on the rezoning until the Comprehensive Plan <br />process has been completed. <br /> <br />The City Council took no formal action on this item. <br /> <br />PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER’S REPORT <br /> <br />Consulting City Engineer David Martini stated he has received an updated schedule from the contractor <br />on the Navarre lighting project. The delivery of the poles will control the completion of the project, but <br />the schedule currently is to commence the project after July 4. Martini indicated the contractor will be <br />doing the sidewalk work and replacing the bases of the light poles. It is anticipated the poles will be <br />delivered toward the end of August. Martini stated he will put together a project summary for the City’s <br />website and also create a handout that can be handed out to the adjacent property owners. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.