Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 10, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />    Page 8 of 30   <br />(6. #13-3637 WILLI ABBOTT O/B/O THE BROADWAY GROUP, LLC, 2350 WATERTOWN <br />ROAD AND XXX WILLOW DRIVE NORTH – PRELIMINARY PLAT AND RPUD REZONING – <br />DRAFT RESOLUTION, Continued) <br /> <br />Abbott stated the length of the driveway is long enough to make people think twice about putting concrete <br />in and that they would likely be blacktop. Abbott stated in his view the surmountable curbs are more of <br />an urban design and that he is looking for some feedback from the City Council. <br /> <br />Bremer indicated she would be fine with some type of concrete curb and that it does not need to be as <br />intense as a normal public street. Bremer indicated she has lived in neighborhoods that have had both of <br />those options and that there is a pretty consistent issue with the asphalt and the snow plows. Bremer <br />indicated she does not have a problem with something that is a little more urban looking given the fact <br />that the surrounding neighborhoods have it. <br /> <br />Bremer noted she was not in attendance at the last meeting but that she has read the minutes and <br />understand the philosophy behind wanting the 40 feet. Bremer stated her biggest concern is changing the <br />view shed and that she is receptive to the applicant’s comments about the long houses and the bigger <br />visual impact. Bremer stated she does not like the massing appearance from a deeper house since there is <br />a long stretch of house. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if an example of a 35-foot setback would be Maple Avenue. <br /> <br />Bremer stated that would be one example. <br /> <br />McMillan stated even with the 35 feet, someone could ask for a bigger house. <br /> <br />Abbott indicated he does have some control over that. <br /> <br />McMillan stated in her view there should be a restriction for those two lots on how deep the lots should <br />go. McMillan indicated she does not have a definite number at this time and that she does not want to say <br />35 feet if the house is just as deep with a 40-foot setback. <br />Abbott indicated he is in agreement with that and noted that a screen porch could also be added later, <br />which would add to the depth. <br /> <br />McMillan stated this issue does not have to be resolved tonight but that it is something that should be <br />considered. <br /> <br />Abbott stated a total overall square footage number would be one option but that placing too many <br />restrictions on building a house would make it difficult for someone to construct a home. Abbott asked if <br />the City Council could live with a 40-foot depth. <br /> <br />McMillan stated she is not going to do the math tonight but that the applicant can think about it. <br />McMillan stated in her for an extra five feet on the setback, she would like to see some concessions given <br />and that they do not want to see the exact same house being built at 35 feet that is being proposed for 40 <br />feet. <br /> <br />