My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-10-2014 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2014
>
02-10-2014 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2015 2:10:02 PM
Creation date
3/5/2015 2:09:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 10, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 27 of 30 <br />(11. WATER SYSTEM STUDY/WATER SYSTEM MODELING – PRESENTATION, Continued) <br /> <br />Struve stated the school campuses are generally the biggest users. <br /> <br />Martini stated irrigation systems have also become more common nowadays and is more of a draw than it <br />used to be. <br /> <br />The City Council took no formal action on this item. <br /> <br /> <br />12. NAVARRE STREET LIGHT AND SIDEWALK PROJECT – BID AWARD <br /> <br />Struve noted this project was first discussed in July of 2012 and that the project has eventually evolved <br />from looking at a joint project with Spring Park to Orono’s individual project. At the September 9, 2013, <br />Council meeting, Bolton & Menk were authorized to prepare plans and specifications. <br /> <br />Struve stated the results of the poll taken of the resident indicated a preference for brown or black poles. <br />Four different options were presented to the City Council, and based on a discussion, the City Council <br />decided to bid out Options 1 and 2. Based on the bid results from last week, Option 1 is approximately <br />$7,000 less with a total cost of $581,762.78. Option 2 utilizes the same pole, same base, but a different <br />head attachment for a total cost of $588,762.78. <br /> <br />Struve indicated Spring Park elected to go with a flat black pole. The pole company sent a color sample, <br />but instead of sending a dark brown sample, it is a bronze color. Struve stated based on feedback from <br />Spring Park, the flat black does show a lot of the dirt and grime and the poles will need to be power <br />washed in the spring. <br /> <br />Struve stated it would be his recommendation to move forward with the bronze colored option. Struve <br />requested the City Council provide direction on the color and which bid option the Council would like to <br />go with. <br />Levang indicated she likes Option 1 and the bronze color. <br /> <br />Bremer stated she prefers Option 2 due to the visual impact and the bronze color. Bremer indicated she <br />noticed almost right away the flat black poles showed the dirt. <br /> <br />Printup indicated he is in agreement with the bronze. <br /> <br />Levang noted Option 1 is more nautical looking. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if the bid includes the sidewalk work as well. <br /> <br />Struve indicated it includes the sidewalk work, the wiring, and replacement of the bases. Struve noted <br />Spring Park’s initial costs did not replace all of the wiring in the original bid and they ended up having to <br />replace approximately half of the wiring. Total construction costs for Spring Park was just under <br />$500,000. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if the City has heard back on the grant. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.