Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 10, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />    Page 19 of 30   <br />(9. #14-3647 EOF INVESTMENTS, LLC, D/B/A YOUR BOAT CLUB, LLC – 1444 <br />SHORELINE DRIVE – COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR UNDERGROUND FUEL <br />STORAGE TANK INSTALLATION, Continued) <br /> <br />Kujawa stated in his view it would make sense to allow the retail sales at this time since everything they <br />will be putting in will meet every code and requirement to sell fuel to the public. Kujawa stated they are <br />simply locating the fuel dispenser in the proposed location because it would only require a minimal <br />change and they would like it to be ready so they can be fueling by the spring. Kujawa stated without the <br />retail sales being approved, he is not sure whether he would be allowed to fill the boat dealer’s boats. <br />Kujawa noted he likely will not be selling very much retail gas at this point since it the dispenser is <br />located on an interior dock and that it will require an LMCD review to relocate it. Kujawa stated he <br />would ask that the condition prohibiting retail sales be removed. <br /> <br />Gaffron noted a 2,000 gallon tank is not that big of a tank and asked how often he anticipates the tank <br />needing to be refilled. <br /> <br />Kujawa stated this past year they had a 787 gallon tank that they were allowed to fill to 500 gallons and <br />that was typically filled twice a week. Kujawa stated in his view there will not be high volume retail <br />sales. <br /> <br />Levang asked why a bigger tank is not being considered. <br /> <br />Kujawa stated it is primarily cost and the setbacks. <br /> <br />Bremer asked how he feels about moving the storage tank to higher ground and whether that would allow <br />for a bigger tank. <br /> <br />Kujawa stated if a variance were granted, they would definitely look at the costs of installing a bigger <br />tank but that a big part of the application is due to the urgency of getting the approval before the spring. <br />Kujawa indicated he is happy with a 2,000 gallon tank but that he would be willing to look at a bigger <br />tank. Kujawa stated they also looked at moving it closer to the road but that did not gain them much. <br /> <br />Bremer asked if Staff feels it would be preferable to move it to that suggested location. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated the applicant has provided information showing the tank will be at existing grade and <br />that the concern over whether it should be moved to higher ground was whether they would need to deal <br />with floodplain mitigation. The information provided by the applicant has addressed the concerns <br />relating to the tank floating or any inflow into the tank. Gaffron stated at this point he is not sure whether <br />it has any value. <br /> <br />Mattick noted retail gas sales is a permitted use in this district and that in his view the City Council would <br />not be able to take away that right as part of this application. <br /> <br />Levang asked if signage would be necessary for retail sales. <br /> <br /> <br />