My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-24-2014 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
02-24-2014 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2015 2:01:28 PM
Creation date
3/5/2015 2:01:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 24, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 5 of 14 <br />(6. #14-3649 DEREK AND KELLY PRCHAL – 4705 WATERTOWN ROAD – VARIANCE – <br />RESOLUTION NO. – TABLED, Continued) <br /> <br />McMillan noted the applicant would like to increase the size of the nonconformity, which is his personal <br />choice, but that she would prefer the nonconformity not be increased. <br /> <br />Prchal indicated he only wants to construct the building once time and that he would prefer to go as large <br />as possible the first time. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if the Planning Commission discussed screening of the building. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated the Planning Commission did not discuss that and that they felt it was far enough from <br />the road to not require any additional screening. <br /> <br />Prchal pointed out the trees he planted this fall and that he intends to plant additional trees in between <br />those. <br /> <br />McMillan noted there is a little bit of berm in that area as well. <br /> <br />Prchal indicated the trees range from six to eight feet tall and that he would like to plant another five trees <br />in between those. Prchal stated he would be open to planting more trees nearer the building if the City <br />Council requested that. <br /> <br />McMillan stated her only concern is increasing the nonconformity to meet storage needs. McMillan <br />noted the applicant currently has a variance for the existing barn and that she would like to minimize the <br />impact without encroaching closer to the road. <br /> <br />Bremer noted she attended the Planning Commission meeting when this was discussed and that she does <br />not have a problem with the application. Bremer stated the property does have a number of topographical <br />challenges given the slope and the location of the existing structure and house that eliminates some sites. <br />Bremer stated in her view reversing the direction of the structure will make it look quite a bit bigger than <br />the existing barn and that the side walls will be taller, which is not an improvement. Bremer stated she <br />does understand the concern that was raised by Mayor McMillan but that she is okay with where it is <br />being proposed. <br /> <br />McMillan concurred it will be a bigger structure than what currently exists. <br /> <br />Printup asked what the reason was for not turning the building. <br /> <br />Prchal indicated it would impact their view from the house and road as well as require additional space to <br />make the turn off the driveway. <br /> <br />McMillan stated she understands the desire for additional storage but that she is trying to offset the desire <br />for more storage versus the impacts of the structure. McMillan indicated she does see a practical <br />difficulty given the location of the house but that at some point it gets to be overkill in order to <br />accommodate quite a bit of additional storage. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.