Laserfiche WebLink
� , <br /> � O ' V <br /> O O <br /> ���..- CITY of OR4N0 <br /> � � <br /> � <br /> �� G'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � N O. �' '�t <br /> 9kESHOg' � ' � <br /> 3. The Orono PlarLnin; Commission re��iewed this application on February 20. <br /> 1996, and recoinrriended unanimous approval of the proposed variance based <br /> upon the follo��ing unique findings and hardships: <br /> .A. The home was built prior to the Shoreland Regulations approved by the <br /> City in 1992. The structure was built in 1983 through 1984. <br /> B. The oriQinal residence structure conformed to all pertinent Shoreland <br /> Re�ulatioris at that time. , <br /> C. The entire resider.ce stntcture is located �vithin the 7�-150' sPtback area <br /> •,vhere no structural improvements are allowed. Tlie entire structure is <br /> nonconforminb. <br /> D. Based on peninsula shape of the Dayton property and as a result af the <br /> ne«� Shoreland Regulations that redefined what was once a wetland to a <br /> I�Tatural Environment Lake, the majority of dry building area is <br /> unbuildable. <br /> E. The improvements will not result in new hardcover as all additions or <br /> expansions will be placed over existing structure or deck. <br /> F. Applicants have legally combined Lots 1 and 2 to offset any hardcover <br /> -- excess within the 75-2�0' setback area. <br /> G. Hardco��er within the 7�-2�0' setback of combined Lots 1 and 2 is <br /> 18,97� s.f. or 13.4%. The proposed improvement will not result in an <br /> increase in hardcover �vithin the 7�-2�0' setback area. <br /> H. The applicants cannot expand upon their residence without first obtainin� <br /> a variance as a result of the ne�v Shoreland Regulations. <br /> Pa;e 2 of 5 <br />