My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-27-2014 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
01-27-2014 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2015 1:59:07 PM
Creation date
3/5/2015 1:58:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 27, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 7 of 32 <br /> <br />(4. #13-3636 LIXIAO WANG, 3059 FARVIEW LANE – VARIANCES, Continued) <br /> <br />Delaney indicated she has been on that driveway and that if additional structure is placed on the driveway, <br />it will make it very difficult to turn around. Delaney stated their concern is that the applicant will come <br />back requesting additional driveway easement. Delaney stated to her understanding, the applicant has the <br />right to come back and request additional driveway. <br /> <br />Mattick stated it is difficult to know without seeing the easement. <br /> <br />Delaney stated their issue is constructing additional driveway space in the easement since that is their <br />only access to the lake. If you add six feet of additional structure, it will cause even more difficulty to <br />turn around. Delaney stated the applicant does have the option of constructing another structure by the <br />street. Once the leaves are down, the structure is in their view and that they continue to object to the <br />project. <br /> <br />McMillan stated without knowing the exact dimensions, it is difficult to proceed, but that she would like <br />to allow a 6-foot extension if the depth of the garage is only 18 feet. <br /> <br />Levang stated once the numbers are verified, the City Council at the next meeting would then be able to <br />approve either a denial resolution or a resolution approving the addition. <br /> <br />Mattick stated the denial resolution is clear and that the City Council has indicated if it is 23 feet in depth, <br />the variance would be denied due to the lack of a practical difficulty. Mattick asked whether the garage <br />extension would be approved if it measures less than 23 feet or whether it would be approved if it is 18 <br />feet. <br /> <br />McMillan stated if it is 18 feet, the variance should be approved, and if it is anything greater than 18 feet, <br />it would be denied. <br /> <br />Mattick noted technically 18.1 feet in depth would equal a denial and 18 feet or less would equal an <br />approval. <br /> <br />McMillan and Levang agreed that anything greater than 18 feet would be a denial. <br /> <br />Printup stated if the garage is 18 feet, in his view that is functional. <br /> <br />Mattick stated the motion would be to bring back a resolution, and if the measurement on the depth come <br />back at 18 feet even or less, the City Council would approve it per the Planning Commission <br />recommendation. If it comes in at 18.01 or more, Staff will bring back a resolution for denial. <br /> <br />Levang moved, McMillan seconded, to direct Staff to draft a resolution approving Application No. <br />13-3636, Lixiao Wang, 3059 Farview Lane, if the depth of the garage is 18 feet or less per the <br />Planning Commission recommendation based upon Staff’s verification of the number, and subject <br />to elimination of the deck/porch above the garage and no further requests for additional hardcover; <br />and to direct Staff to draft a denial resolution if the depth of the garage is greater than 18 feet. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.