My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-27-2014 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2014
>
01-27-2014 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2015 1:59:07 PM
Creation date
3/5/2015 1:58:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 27, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 25 of 32 <br /> <br />(6. NORTH WATER TOWER REPAINTING PROJECT, Continued) <br /> <br />Spragg stated typically cities would do a design/bid/build approach that is overseen by an engineer. Six <br />percent of the construction costs would go to the engineer to write the plans and specs. The City would <br />then award the project to the lowest bidder. An engineer would subsequently be hired to oversee the <br />construction or rehab work, which would amount to approximately 10 percent of the costs, which would <br />be based on the amount of time spent inspecting the construction work. Both the engineer’s costs and the <br />subsequent rehabilitation costs would be due upon satisfactory completion of the work. Spragg noted <br />there typically will be a one-year warranty on the tank. The City would have the option of adding either a <br />two or a five-year extended warranty as bid alternates but that that option can end up being very costly. <br />Spragg stated SEH has done a 40-year analysis with regard to total cost of ownership. A comparison was <br />done with the City of Cottage Grove showing significant savings by utilizing the design/build method. In <br />the comparison, the Cities of Arden Hills, St. Paul Park, and Vadnais Heights were compared to the <br />proposal from the design-build team of SEH/Classic. In the study, it was determined that Cottage Grove <br />would realize savings of $80,000 to $200,000 under the design-build method. Spragg indicated the most <br />typical size for this type of tower is 1,000,000 gallons rather than 400,000 gallons. <br /> <br />Spragg stated if the City is interested in the design-build method, the costs, with interest, can be spread <br />out over the life of the contract. The tank would be warrantied against defects for the length of the <br />contract, and if the coating fails, SEH would pay for that. <br /> <br />McMillan asked what type of failure he is talking about. <br /> <br />Spragg stated chipping or corroding would be included in the 5-year contract and that SEH would <br />perform routine inspections of the tank over the life of the contract. Spragg stated painting a 140-foot <br />structure that is exposed to the elements is not an exact science and that there are things that will occur, <br />such as chipping. The worst case scenario would be metal loss. Spragg indicated SEH would prefer to <br />address it when it is in the chipping stage. In addition some staining and streaking may occur. <br /> <br />McMillan asked what some typical interior failures would be. <br /> <br />Spragg stated they would be similar to the exterior. Spragg stated the wet interior is a very caustic <br />environment and there could be straining or corrosion as well. Spragg indicated SEH will perform <br />interior and exterior pressure washing of the tank, which will address the staining, and if there is spot <br />corrosion, they will also address that. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if that is also included in the costs. <br /> <br />Spragg indicated it is. Spragg stated in 2002, the MN Legislature amended Section 471.345 to allow for <br />municipalities to enter into multi-year professional service contracts for engineering, repair, and <br />maintenance of a water storage tank. The benefits of this approach are the contractor works with an <br />engineering firm on the inspection and review of the tanks, which allows them to have intimate <br />knowledge of the tank and allows them to include an aggressive price on the project. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.