My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-27-2014 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2014
>
01-27-2014 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2015 1:59:07 PM
Creation date
3/5/2015 1:58:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 27, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 23 of 32 <br /> <br />(5. #13-3637 WILLI ABBOTT ON BEHALF OF THE BROADWAY GROUP, LLC – 2350 <br />WATERTOWN ROAD AND XXX WILLOW DRIVE NORTH – PRELIMINARY PLAT AND RPUD <br />REZONING, Continued) <br /> <br />Levang stated she can see the rain gardens functioning for the first few years but then after that she can <br />see them becoming a problem. <br /> <br />Campion stated the outlots will be like a quasi-rain garden and will basically be small basins/rain gardens <br />to provide some rate control. <br /> <br />Levang stated she would encourage them to come back with something other than a rain garden. <br /> <br />McMillan indicated she is in agreement. <br /> <br />McMillan noted Staff is looking for direction on the resolution. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated he is not sure whether Staff can draft a resolution at this point since there are enough <br />changes being proposed. Gaffron stated if an outlot is required, Staff would need to have new numbers <br />submitted on each of the lots. Gaffron stated if the City Council does not want an outlot, then perhaps <br />Staff could bring back a resolution. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the City Council to require no outlot, a 40-foot side setback, 15 percent coverage, <br />and to make it a private road. <br /> <br />Gaffron noted all the roads in the neighborhood are private with bump-outs for parking. Kelly Parkway is <br />a public road and Creekside is a private road and was done as a PRUD because it was in the two-acre <br />zone with the homes being clustered to preserve wetlands and uplands. Gaffron indicated those lots are <br />three-quarters to one acre on a private road with public sewer and water. The development on Watertown <br />Road was done as PRD due to the density. Gaffron indicated Stone Bay is unique because it is individual <br />pads with a big common area. <br /> <br />Gaffron noted the City Council has indicated they are looking for something a little bit different than <br />Glendale Cove. Gaffron stated to his understanding the parameters of the development are that the road <br />be made private, a 15 percent limit on all lots, a 40-foot setback for the two lots that abut Willow Drive, <br />no outlot for the wetland, the tree preservation area should not be an outlot, no designation of 10 percent <br />of the property for recreation, the developer should design something other than rain gardens, no curb and <br />gutter, and no walking easement. <br /> <br />McMillan indicated that is correct. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated given that direction, Staff can draft a resolution for the next City Council meeting. <br />Gaffron indicated he is not sure how the consolidation of easements should be handled. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.