Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 13, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />    Page 9 of 17   <br />(5. #13-3638 and #13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC (PAT HILLER) ON BEHALF <br /> OF GRANT WENKSTERN (LAKEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTH ARM DRIVE, <br /> COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND SKETCH PLAN REVIEW – <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 6360, Continued) <br /> <br />Brixius stated during this process, the applicant has provided information and made an argument that it is <br />no longer economically feasible for them to continue to operate their golf course and they are requesting <br />an alternative use consistent with the current zoning. The proposed development is an unsewered, 2-acre <br />lot rural residential development. The development is also intended to reflect the rural densities that are <br />currently allowed in the neighborhood. At the last City Council meeting, the Council specifically <br />indicated to the developer that no lot averaging will be considered and that he must meet the required two <br />acres of buildable land for each lot. Brixius noted to date there have been no formal approvals of any <br />development plans or subdivisions and these would have to subsequently be presented. <br /> <br />Brixius stated the proposed development will be an unsewered area and will depend on either private well <br />systems for each lot or possibly water coming out of Minnetrista, which is undetermined at this time. <br />Any new subdivision will be required to comply with Orono’s current contemporary stormwater <br />management requirements that will address both rate control and water treatment. The development will <br />likely cause improvements in both of those areas. Information has been provided that the proposed <br />development will have similar traffic generation as the golf course, and through the subdivision design <br />will create alternative access points that will distribute the traffic in a variety of manners. <br /> <br />Brixius noted the City currently has in place contemporary management and regulations on stormwater, <br />septic systems, water supply, and road designs that will all have to be incorporated and addressed through <br />the subdivision process. <br /> <br />Brixius noted the findings of the City are that historically Orono has only chosen to acquire public land or <br />open space through dedication, donation, or negotiated purchase, and has not sought pubic acquisition of <br />property against the wishes of the property owner. In choosing to follow that current practice, the <br />designation of the property to an alternative land use would be appropriate. <br /> <br />Brixius noted that the City is also is making a finding that the application of the rural residential land use <br />category to this site appears to be the most viable and realistic alternative and is most consistent with the <br />surrounding land uses. In addition, the City is making the finding that the proposed use will not <br />overburden the City’s public service capacity or infrastructure, and the City is also stipulating that the <br />conversion from open space to rural residential will not have a substantial impact and will be consistent <br />with the surrounding land use in the area. <br /> <br />Brixius noted that the Planning Commission voted in October on a 6-1 vote to approve the land use <br />change. If the City Council is satisfied with the findings contained with the resolution, the City Council <br />should make a motion to approve the Comprehensive Plan change. Brixius noted the Comprehensive <br />Plan change would be subject to Metropolitan Council review and approval. <br /> <br />McMillan noted many of the findings were discussed last week at the special meeting on Monday and that <br />the proposal was also discussed on November 12, including a public hearing, which was followed by a <br />60-day extension. McMillan stated in her view the City Council has had a fairly lengthy discussion on all <br />the issues regarding this amendment. <br />