My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-06-2014 Council Minutes Special Meeting
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
01-06-2014 Council Minutes Special Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2015 1:58:14 PM
Creation date
3/5/2015 1:57:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />SPECIAL ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 6, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 4 of 27 <br />(1. #13-3638 and #13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC (PAT HILLER) O/B/O GRANT <br /> WENKSTERN (LAKEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTH ARM DRIVE – COMPREHENSIVE <br /> PLAN AMENDMENT AND SKETCH PLAN REVIEW, Continued) <br /> <br />Printup noted the City’s Comprehensive Plan came about in the mid-1970s, and that he is struggling with <br />the strength of the Comprehensive Plan versus the land use and zoning of properties. Printup noted that <br />reconciling those two appears to be causing a number of people some issues. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the zoning of Orono did not start until 1950. In November of 1950, the area where <br />Lakeview exists was zoned the Forest Lake District, which required a 15,000 square foot minimum lot <br />size and a 75-foot lot width. Over the next 10 years, the City required that all new developments have <br />larger lot areas and lot widths. In 1960, the requirements for the majority of the City became one acre lots <br />with a 140-foot lot width. In 1967, the City rezoned large portions of Orono, with roughly the northwest <br />half of the City being zoned R-1C, which consisted of single-family, one-acre minimum lot sizes and <br />145-foot lot widths. That zoning was changed again in 1975 to RR-1B, which is the City’s typical rural <br />residential two-acre minimum. That two acre zoning exists today. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated in terms of the City’s Comprehensive Plan, the first plan was adopted in 1974, and shows <br />lakeshore residential lot for the southeasterly three-quarters of the properties and rural residential for the <br />northwesterly three-quarters of the properties. That 1974 plan also indicated recreation facilities of <br />metropolitan significance. Gaffron stated his assumption is that it means a recreation area that drew more <br />than just the local residents, such as the different golf courses. <br /> <br />In 1980, the City adopted a new Comprehensive Plan. The land use plan showed various areas as park <br />and recreation areas, including all public and privately owned golf courses. In the 2000-2020 <br />Comprehensive Plan, it listed a category for park, recreation and open space. The City’s 2008-2030 <br />Comprehensive Plan had the same designation. Gaffron stated the City’s Comprehensive Plans over the <br />years contained zoning that allowed residential development as early as 1950 and it has been zoned <br />residential ever since. Gaffron noted the City did not have a guide plan until 1974, but that guide plan has <br />always shown this property as a park and recreation area. <br /> <br />Anderson asked if a different type of weighting was given in 1995 to the primary land controls in the <br />Comprehensive Plan versus the City’s zoning ordinances. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated she is probably talking about the Comprehensive Plan versus zoning and the hierarchy of <br />one over the other. <br /> <br />Mattick stated there was some discussion back then about which takes priority - the Comprehensive Plan <br />or the City’s zoning to the extent they are inconsistent. Mattick stated in some of the materials that have <br />been submitted tonight, it suggests that the Comprehensive Plan controls. Mattick stated in his view the <br />history of the City’s Comprehensive Plans is important, but in terms of the hierarchy and which one <br />controls, that does not really matter at this point. Mattick stated in his opinion, based on the MN Supreme <br />Court and the state statutes, it is more important for the City to get them in alignment with each other. <br />Mattick stated whether that is accomplished by changing the Comprehensive Plan or zoning ordinances <br />does not matter but that they need to be consistent. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.