Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />SPECIAL ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 6, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />    Page 21 of 27   <br />(1. #13-3638 and #13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC (PAT HILLER) O/B/O GRANT <br /> WENKSTERN (LAKEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTH ARM DRIVE – COMPREHENSIVE <br /> PLAN AMENDMENT AND SKETCH PLAN REVIEW, Continued) <br /> <br />McMillan stated according to a 1995 state statute, the City is required to do some housekeeping and <br />reconcile that difference, which is where the City is at tonight. McMillan noted the application in front of <br />them creates a strict 120-day time frame in which to make this decision. Given the past history and <br />information that has been provided, McMillan indicated she will be voting in favor of amending the <br />Comprehensive Plan. McMillan stated the reasons she sees for approving this include the long-term <br />history of this property being seen as a residential property, the fact that two-acre residential zoning <br />continues to be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood, the fact that there exists adequate capacity <br />on this site for stormwater control, and that there will be traffic and buffering requirements that will be <br />required to be met as part of this development. In addition, the applicant will need to obtain proper <br />permits for septic and wells and the two-acre density will not overburden the City’s public safety <br />capacity. <br /> <br />McMillan stated although this property has been open space for a number of years and that she feels <br />empathy for the neighbors that would lose the open space, this property does not have any unique natural <br />resources. McMillan stated it is a golf course and golf courses are not necessarily a unique natural <br />resource unlike 140 acres of woods or a particular lakeshore property that might serve a benefit as far as a <br />public beach or that type of amenity. McMillan stated she does recognize and appreciate the concern <br />about the open space, but noted there are no natural resources issues on this property that would make the <br />City think this is something they should keep and possibly compensate the property owner for. <br /> <br />McMillan noted there was no formal process that was undertaken by the City in guiding this property as <br />open space under the Comprehensive Plan, which is important to take into consideration. McMillan <br />stated if the City is thinking of changing the zoning of a particular property, there needs to be a process <br />where the property owner is notified and brought before the City Council to discuss that change. <br />McMillan stated there was not a thorough examination conducted by the City about changing private <br />open space to public park land under the recent Comprehensive Plan, including possible ramifications to <br />the City or the property owner. <br /> <br />McMillan stated in her view it is important that private property rights are respected, which is good <br />government. McMillan indicated she did not really understand the Comprehensive Plan until she became <br />a council member and that it is a planning document that through the years has gained more and more <br />significance. When the first comprehensive plan was developed in the 1970s, it was considered more as a <br />broad philosophical plan. Through the years it has evolved into more micro-managing of individual sites <br />and density, especially as it relates to city sewer capacity. McMillan stated the basic philosophy of the <br />City’s Comprehensive Plan is terrific but the City has had some struggles implementing it over the <br />decades in regards to what the City desires and what the Metropolitan Council would like the City to be. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />