My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-06-2014 Council Minutes Special Meeting
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
01-06-2014 Council Minutes Special Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2015 1:58:14 PM
Creation date
3/5/2015 1:57:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />SPECIAL ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 6, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 2 of 27 <br />(1. #13-3638 and #13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC (PAT HILLER) O/B/O GRANT <br /> WENKSTERN (LAKEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTH ARM DRIVE – COMPREHENSIVE <br /> PLAN AMENDMENT AND SKETCH PLAN REVIEW, Continued) <br /> <br />Grittman noted the primary issues resulting from a denial and/or approval would be legal and budgetary <br />issues but that it is not impossible to read the Comprehensive Plan to say that it is best to leave it as open <br />space. A yes vote to the applicant’s proposal would re-guide the property from its current open space <br />designation to rural residential and there are potential issues that would flow from that. <br /> <br />Grittman indicated the nature of development under this scenario is still uncertain at this point. The <br />applicants have proposed a series of sketch plans, and noted that the City Council, by simply changing the <br />land use designation, does not lock the City into any specific plat or development plan. The rural <br />residential designation is consistent with the existing zoning and there are several policies in the <br />Comprehensive Plan that would sustain this land use designation. Grittman stated the issues are primarily <br />based around issues relating to compatibility with the existing land use pattern in the area. <br /> <br />Grittman stated the final issue before the City Council would be development and design and what type of <br />development would result with a rural residential designation. Grittman stated the different land use <br />designations for the community have a number of aspects to them that are written in the Comprehensive <br />Plan. Grittman indicated if there is an approval, the Comprehensive Plan amendment would then be <br />submitted to the Metropolitan Council. The Metropolitan Council would then be obligated to make a <br />determination as to whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the regional planning documents <br />within its areas of jurisdiction. <br /> <br />Staff recommends approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment and believes it is consistent with <br />existing zoning in the area. Grittman indicated the rural residential land use designation would <br />accommodate residential land use with two-acre lot zoning, which is consistent with this zoning district. <br />Grittman stated the City would avoid certain legal or budgetary uncertainties if this approach is taken. <br />The two-acre residential development would be consistent with the surrounding area, which Staff feels is <br />one of the strongest factors supporting this particular amendment proposal. In addition, the City’s <br />platting requirements ensure that the area will be protected from environmental threats, traffic problems, <br />or engineering concerns. Grittman stated many of the other technical concerns that flow out of a <br />development proposal on land such as this would be really very well managed by the City’s development <br />regulations, such as its subdivision regulations and environmental regulations. As a result, Staff is <br />confident that development on this property would not raise a threat to the environment, which is also a <br />supporting factor of the idea that a change to the land use plan can be made in that regard. <br /> <br />Following the decision on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment by the City Council, a discussion will be <br />had on the sketch plan proposed by the applicant. The applicants have submitted a second alternative <br />sketch plan for review in addition to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Grittman noted the <br />applicant’s revised sketch plan does rely on some Planned Residential Development by varying lot sizes <br />but does not provide the large open space component that was part of the original sketch plan. <br /> <br />In support of the revised sketch plan, the applicants have taken a series of soil borings and percolation <br />tests, prepared a generalized stormwater management plan, conferred with Hennepin County in relation to <br />road design and access, conferred with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District regarding stormwater <br />management, and addressed the directives of the City’s Conservation Design principles. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.