Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />February 9, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 13 of 26 <br /> <br />(7. #15-3714 CREATE SECTION 14-142 WELLHEAD PROTECTION ORDINANCE – <br />ORDINANCE NO. 135 continued) <br /> <br />McMillan noted Green Trees was for connection to City sewer and not water. <br /> <br />Levang moved, McMillan seconded, to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 135, an Ordinance for Protecting <br />the City’s Wellheads by Prohibiting New Private Wells Where Public Water Supply is Available. <br />VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 2, Walsh and Printup Opposed. <br /> <br />*8. #15-3715 AMENDMENT TO MUNICIPAL CODE SETION 14-134: SERVICE PIPES – <br />ORDINANCE NO. 137 <br /> <br />Levang moved, Cornick seconded, to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 137, an Ordinance Amending the <br />Municipal Code by Revising the Responsibilities for Water Service Repairs. VOTE: Ayes 5, <br />Nays 0. <br /> <br />9. STORM WATER AND DRAINAGE TRUNK FEE REVIEW <br /> <br />Gaffron noted the City Council first looked at this issue back in May of 2014 at a work session. In 2002 <br />the City adopted a surface water management plan that serves as a guide for developing and management <br />of the surface water system of the City. That surface water plan was updated in January of 2011. <br /> <br />An element of the plan is an inventory of the existing surface water systems, which includes a variety of <br />stormwater facilities such as storm sewer pipes, drainage ways, ponding areas, etc. In addition, the 2002 <br />plan identified long-term system improvements that would be needed as the City becomes more fully <br />developed to deal with stormwater management as it relates to water quality and water quantity. The <br />2002 had an estimated cost of nearly $11 million in 1998 dollars. <br /> <br />The update of the surface water plan in 2011 acknowledged that there are difficulties in funding surface <br />water management needs. The CIP categorizes planned expenditures in four specific areas. It talks about <br />activities associated with meeting the City’s obligations towards its NPDES or National Pollution <br />Discharge Elimination System permit, which includes educational materials, cleanup days, inspection <br />programs for illicit sewer and septic system discharges, etc. <br /> <br />A second element of the plan included capital improvement projects, such as implementation of the plan <br />itself, water quality and water quantity projects for developing areas, wetland restorations, priority <br />projects for developed areas, and ongoing operations and maintenance of the storm sewer system. It also <br />included implementation of official controls, which are City Ordinances. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the annual planned City expenditures in these four areas total approximately $250,000 to <br />$350,000 a year. Gaffron indicated there are a small number of funding sources to accomplish these <br />goals and noted the level of funding needed for planned Capital Improvement projects is not fully covered <br />by the stormwater utility or permit fees. Gaffron noted the City will likely have some issues with <br />phosphorus reduction requirements since it is likely the total maximum daily load studies will suggest <br />there are certain bodies of the water within the City that are going to require projects. <br />