Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />February 9, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 10 of 26 <br /> <br />7. #15-3714 CREATE SECTION 14-142 WELLHEAD PROTECTION ORDINANCE – <br />ORDINANCE NO. 135 <br /> <br />Edwards stated the purpose of this City Ordinance is to create Section 14-142 to provide for wellhead <br />protection by prohibiting new private wells where public water supply is available. In October of 2013, <br />the City adopted its Wellhead Protection Plan. The WHPP is a requirement of the Minnesota Department <br />of Health under Minnesota State Statutes and is a method of preventing contamination of a public water <br />supply well by effectively managing potential contaminant sources in the area which contributes water to <br />a public water supply well. <br /> <br />Edwards stated part of the plan was a series of improvements the City agreed to do to protect its wells. <br />One of those requirements was to establish a City Ordinance to protect the wells by prohibiting new <br />private wells within protection zones, which corresponds with the City’s water distribution system. If a <br />person has a fully functioning well, they will not be required to be connected to the city water until the <br />well becomes nonfunctioning or the building undergoes major remodeling resulting in an increase in <br />water use that exceeds the capacity of the well. If it is not feasible to connect to a public water supply or <br />if private on-site water supplementation is required as determined by the City of Orono, a well may be <br />drilled in accordance with the specifications and provisions of the Minnesota Department of Health. At <br />the time connection to the public water supply is completed, all existing private wells no longer in use <br />shall be capped by a licensed well contractor. <br /> <br />Printup asked if that means that if a private well fails, the property owner cannot drill another one or <br />whether they are allowed to drill on an alternate site. <br /> <br />Edwards concurred that there are numerous alternate sites for drilling another well on any particular <br />property. <br /> <br />Walsh asked if this is a mandate or a suggestion they would like the City to follow. <br /> <br />Edwards stated it is a suggestion. <br />Walsh stated he would want to be able to drill another well and that he does not want someone to cap <br />their wells if they are able to fix it. Walsh stated that should be an option as well as allowing a person to <br />be able to drill a new well for irrigation. Walsh stated in his view it seems like a land grab by the <br />government to push people on City water and that he is not in favor of that. <br /> <br />Edwards stated in his view the City Ordinance would allow people to make repairs to their well but that it <br />would prohibit someone from getting a new well permit from the State and drilling a new well. <br /> <br />Walsh indicated he would not be in agreement with that and that people should be able to drill a new well <br />if they want to. <br /> <br />Printup asked if a person could drill deeper if their well runs dry. <br /> <br />Edwards stated the resident would be allowed to do maintenance on their well, but that if they need to <br />drill a new well, the City Ordinance would require them to obtain a permit from the state. Edwards stated <br />the City Ordinance would prohibit someone from getting that permit to get a new well.