My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-26-2015 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
01-26-2015 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2015 1:50:44 PM
Creation date
3/5/2015 1:50:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 26, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 2 of 14 <br /> <br />(3. #15-3705 AMEND CHAPTER 78, ARTICLE IV, DIVISION 7 AND 8, ELIMINATE RR1B-1 <br />AND <br />M-6 DISTRICTS – ORDINANCE NO. 130 continued) <br /> <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the M-6 Multiple Family Planned Residential District was created in 1976 to provide <br />standards for multiple-family development but has been superseded almost entirely by the 1989 PUD <br />zoning ordinance as well as the RPUD, which was created in February of 2001. The City has never, since <br />1976, had any property zoned M-6, this is an outdated piece of the City Code. Staff recommends those <br />two districts be removed from the City Code. <br /> <br />Levang stated the changes are straight forward. <br /> <br />McMillan indicated she also is fine with the changes. <br /> <br />Levang moved, Cornick seconded, to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 130, Third Series, an Ordinance <br />Amending the Orono Zoning City Code by Eliminating the RR-1B-1 and M-6 ZONING <br />DISTRICTS. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. <br /> <br />4. #15-3706 AMEND SECTION 78-1211 REGARDING CLARIFICATION TO THE TOE OF <br />BLUFF DEFINITION – ORDINANCE NO. 131 <br /> <br />Gaffron stated this definition was questioned by an attorney as the City was going through a variance <br />application last year. Gaffron stated the City’s definition exactly mimics the State Statute’s definition, <br />but there was a question about how many different points on a slope might be defined as the toe of bluff. <br />Gaffron stated from a practical standpoint, there can only be one toe. <br /> <br />The proposed language changes the language it to state that the toe of the bluff is the lower point of the <br />lowest 50-foot segment with an average slope exceeding 18 percent. Gaffron stated essentially that <br />means when it is a steep slope and it ends right at the lakeshore, you would not go out into the water to <br />get to that 18 percent. As a result, when the toe is defined as lakeward of the OHW, the OHW becomes <br />the toe and not some point out in the lake. <br /> <br />Levang stated she does remember that discussion on the variance application and that she is happy there <br />is a clarification on the definition. <br /> <br />Mayor McMillan asked if there is any public comment on the amendment. <br /> <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br /> <br />Levang moved, Cornick seconded, to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 131, Third Series, an Ordinance <br />Amending the Orono Zoning City Code by Amending the Definition of “Toe of Bluff.” VOTE: <br />Ayes 3, Nays 0. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.