Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 12, 2015 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(3. 2325 GLENDALE COVE — ENCROACHMENT ISSUE continued) <br />McMillan stated she was wondering whether there is a final agreement with the Watershed District about <br />what will be planted and the location of the buffer. <br />Mr. Hoehn stated the black line is the wall. <br />McMillan asked if he is being asked to remove the sod <br />Mr. Hoehn stated to his understanding he is in that area and that he would like to compromise on the other <br />side. Hoehn indicated he is willing to do buckthorn mitigation and other things to help offset that. <br />McMillan stated from her point of view, whatever plan that is worked out with the Watershed District is <br />fine, but that she had thought the Council would be seeing a final plan from the Watershed District <br />tonight. McMillan indicated she would like to see that if the City goes ahead with an encroachment <br />agreement. <br />Mr. Hoehn asked if the easement area behind the house could be designated to take the place of any area <br />that is impacted currently. Hoehn pointed out the easement on the overhead. <br />McMillan stated to her understanding that is not part of their property and that it would be difficult to use <br />that. <br />Gaffron stated the sewer easement goes from west to east behind the property <br />McMillan stated sometimes the Watershed District will agree to move the wetland buffer but that she <br />cannot speak for them. McMillan suggested they speak with the Watershed District and come up with a <br />formal plan. <br />Walsh stated he would not be opposed to having the motion state subject to. <br />Levang stated she would like to see the plan so everyone understands what is going to happen since the <br />City does need to sign off on the encroachment agreement. <br />Printup moved to direct Staff to draft an encroachment agreement allowing the entire retaining <br />wall subject to compliance with the regulations the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District would <br />require for establishment of the native vegetation. <br />Mattick stated the encroachment agreement would come back to the City Council at approximately the <br />same time that the plan with the MCWD is finalized. <br />Walsh seconded the motion. <br />Walsh stated he does not want to penalize the Hoehn's with after -the -fact permit fees due to the unknown <br />origin of the permits. Walsh noted the Hoehn's thought they were dealing with the right people. <br />Printup stated he would accept that amendment to the motion. <br />(3. 2325 GLENDALE COVE — ENCROACHMENT ISSUE continued) <br />Page 7 of 19 <br />