My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-12-2013 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2013
>
11-12-2013 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2015 3:42:27 PM
Creation date
2/23/2015 3:42:24 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE � <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Tuesday,November 12,2013 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (8. #I3-3638 and 13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL,LLC(PAT HILLER) OB/O GRANT <br /> WENKSTERN(LAKEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTHARMDRIVE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN <br /> AMENDMENT AND SKETCH PLAN REVIEW, Continued) <br /> Grittman stated from a Comprehensive Plan standpoint,the surrounding land uses are predominantly rural <br /> residential. The current zoning is RR-1B,which allows rural residential development at one dwelling unit <br /> per two acres of dry land. The roadways in this area are definite issues and are factors that any developer <br /> would have to consider. Access to the neighboring roads and North Arm Drive,which currently serves <br /> the golf course,will need to be addressed. Improvements to the roadways, if deemed necessary,would be <br /> studied as part of the preliminary plat submission. <br /> Grittman noted retaining the current open space designation is not economically viable for the private <br /> land owner. Grittman stated the City cannot compel a single property owner to provide public space out <br /> of the scope that other individual property owners contribute to that cause. <br /> Grittman stated the sketch plan review from the City's perspective is to identify issues or objectives and is <br /> not an approval or denial. A sketch plan review is the City's opportunity to explain to the developers <br /> what the City would like to see happen with the property. Since the information is still preliminary at this <br /> point,the comments are intended to help all parties understand the requirements for a full plat design and <br /> give everyone an understanding of what the base line rules are going to be. <br /> As it relates to the overall view of the sketch plan,the proposal is based on 118 acres of dry buildable <br /> land. The proposal consists of two possible altemative layouts,with one of those offered as the preferred <br /> alternative for the property. The second option is a layout that is based on the allowable density under the <br /> proposed amendment and follows the current zoning. The second option is based on preliminary site data <br /> and the lot count would need to be verified. <br /> Grittman indicated the first plan illustrates an alternative that would utilize the threshold unit count under <br /> the zoning and land use plan and then cluster those lots to the higher portions of the site. By reducing the <br /> lot sizes and clustering the as shown in the plan,the applicants would propose to retain a significant <br /> portion of the site for open space. Much of this preservation area is shown around the perimeter of the <br /> site. <br /> The layout proposed in Option 1 is a traditional layout with full development of the property except for <br /> the wetlands. There would be approximately 6,500 lineal feet of roadway. There are four road <br /> connections to existing roadways in the sketch which include two roadways to North Arm Drive and two <br /> road connections to West Branch that are shown to provide access to the lots within the project. There are <br /> four lots with direct access to the existing street,with the remaining lots having access to the new street <br /> within the development. There are no other significant amenities as part of the development that are <br /> outlined in the sketch plan. <br /> Subject to all the data that would need to be provided as part of a plat application,the question is whether <br /> the City is more inclined to a PRD or the traditional two acre zoning. The Planning Commission's <br /> recommendations were to follow the PRD approach and retain the common open space. The Planning <br /> Commission also commented on how to address traffic,pedestrian issues, stormwater management issues, <br /> and septic suitability on the smaller lots. <br /> Page 12 of 36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.