Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING � <br /> Monday,October 28,2013 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (S. #13-3629 RYANAND STACYALNESS, 1169 NORTHARMDRIVE,SUBDIVISION— <br /> RESOL UTION NO. 6335, Continued) <br /> Struve indicated the work involved would be removing the controls off of the pole and relocating them <br /> and then some internal work on the lift station would also need to be completed. The actual manhole will <br /> not be relocated. The improvements that were outlined to Mr. and Mrs.Alness were replacing the top <br /> access panel to make it a drivable access point along with a few other minor items. The lift station itself <br /> will not be moved but a drivable hatch will be installed. Struve stated he is not sure whether that will <br /> solve the access issues completely but that it is a start. <br /> McMillan asked what other costs might be associated with this project. <br /> Struve stated the drivable rated hatches are pretty standard and it just needs to be measured and then <br /> ordered. <br /> McMillan asked when the controls would be moved. <br /> Struve stated it is in the CIP for 2014 but that it is not set in stone. <br /> Bremer noted she was not in attendance at the last City Council meeting but that she would be interested <br /> in knowing whether any of the Council Members would change their opinion or if this has alleviated their <br /> concerns. <br /> Levang stated the Council was dealing with the Special Lot Combination and that access was not really <br /> discussed since it was a separate issue. <br /> McMillan stated in her opinion the City Council needs to go forward with the denial resolution tonight <br /> and that it is up to the applicant to pursue the access issue. <br /> Mattick stated the new application would be a request to terminate the Special Lot Agreement but it <br /> would be slightly different given the access being resolved. <br /> McMillan stated it comes down to the legal language contained in the Special Lot Agreement and that <br /> under the subdivision rules it requires a conforming lot. McMillan stated the City cannot make any <br /> guarantees that the request will be approved. <br /> Mattick stated the issue with the lot size will remain but that the access issue would make it a different <br /> application. <br /> Levang moved,Anderson seconded,to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6335,a Resolution Denying a <br /> Request to Extinguish a Special Lot Combination and Denying a Subdivision of the property <br /> located at 1169 North Arm Drive. VOTE: Ayes 3,Nays 0,Printup and Bremer Abstained. <br /> Page 6 of 14 <br />