Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE • <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING - <br /> Monday,August 26,2013 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (7. #13-3621 THOMAS WASMOEN ON BEHALF OF JOHN BESSESEN, 2445,2455, 2465 <br /> SHADYWOOD ROAD,2560 KELLYAVENUE,AND PID 20-117-23-11-0032—SKETCH PLAN <br /> REVIEW, Continued) <br /> Wasmoen indicated the Conservation Design would be part of the design process and that at this time <br /> they are attempting to gauge the interest of the City for this type of development before proceeding any <br /> further. Wasmoen noted they omitted some trees for clarity on the plan but that there would be trees on <br /> every property. In addition,the green area by the church is also not depicted. The driveway is shown to <br /> be as efficient as possible but it can be moved slightly away from the property lines in order to add <br /> additional green buffer areas. <br /> Wasmoen stated they are looking at a development for people 55 and older and that it will not generate as <br /> much traffic as some of the other residential developments in the City. Wasmoen indicated they are <br /> attempting to create a walkable community and provide some vitality to the area. The green buffer and <br /> wetlands along Kelly will be maintained and most of the proposed units will also have their own buffer <br /> from Kelly Avenue which will not be visible until you get up by the grocery store. <br /> Levang indicated she is opposed to the density since they are proposing approximately five units per acre. <br /> Levang stated she does like the buffer along Kelly but that it appears the area would need to be rezoned, <br /> which she is opposed to. Levang indicated she also has great concerns regarding what the Conservation <br /> Design will show and that the overall density is a major concern at this point. <br /> Levang asked whether they own any of the property at this point. <br /> Wasmoen indicated they would not purchase the property until they can move forward with the <br /> development agreement. <br /> McMillan stated she also has issues with the single-family parcels in the middle of the higher density <br /> housing. McMillan noted the idea of creating an RPUD was brought up as a way to perhaps cluster some <br /> of the units but that in her view the density shown on the concept plan will not work. McMillan stated the <br /> clear-cut land might be okay for some townhomes but that she would like to see lower density in this area. <br /> McMillan noted commercial can have as much impact as townhomes and that perhaps the City does not <br /> need commercial going that far down County Road 19. McMillan stated there is some merit to looking at <br /> slightly higher density in that area but the area between the church and north of there is questionable <br /> about whether it should be rezoned. McMillan stated she is not ready to put in high-density residential <br /> housing in this area. <br /> Wasmoen stated they are not looking to construct high density housing and that they are attempting to <br /> work with the grades and keep the scale as residential as possible. <br /> McMillan noted Kelly Avenue is a single-family residential neighborhood. <br /> Bremer noted there are townhomes currently by the bowling alley on Kelly Avenue. <br /> McMillan stated the townhomes could perhaps be located off of Shadywood but that the City needs to <br /> protect Kelly Avenue given the water problems. <br /> Page 8 of 21 <br />