My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-26-2013 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
08-26-2013 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2015 2:58:23 PM
Creation date
2/23/2015 2:58:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
' MINUTES OF THE <br /> • ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,August 26,2013 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (6. #13-3617 WILLIAMAND CYNTHIA BOWMAN, 450 WILLOW DRIVE SOUTH, <br /> VARIANCE—RESOL UTION NO. 6314, Continued) <br /> Levang moved,Printup seconded,to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6314,a Resolution Granting a <br /> Variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-420(B),for the Property Located at 450 Willow <br /> Drive South. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> 7. #13-3621 THOMAS WASMOEN ON BEHALF OF JOHN BESSESEN,2445,2455,2465 <br /> SHADYWOOD ROAD,2560 KELLY AVENUE,AND PID 20-117-23-11-0032—SKETCH PLAN <br /> REVIEW <br /> Thomas Wasmoen and John Bessesen,Applicants,were present. <br /> Gaffron stated this is a sketch plan review which is a process that allows the developer to propose an <br /> initial concept plan to the City. Procedurally the Code provides that the plan be reviewed by the Planning <br /> Commission, which occurred last Monday, but given the nature of the proposal, Staff wanted this sketch <br /> plan to come before the City Council. Gaffron noted as part of a sketch plan review, notice is not given to <br /> the adjoining property owners and public comments are generally not received. <br /> Gaffron stated the proposed site for this development is the property outlined in yellow on the overhead. <br /> The property located to the northwest is the Lunds property and further down to the right is Mr. <br /> Masserano's church properiy. The application at this point is purely a concept for discussion as to how <br /> this group of properties might be developed at a higher residential density. The zoning for these properties <br /> is B4, commercial office business district. Properties along Kelly are zoned LR-1B. <br /> The Planning Commission reviewed the application and they provided a number of comments, <br /> suggestions, and concerns to the developer, which are included on Page 2 of Staffls report. <br /> Gaffron stated other factors that should be discussed include the fact that the City's Comprehensive Plan <br /> did guide this area for mixed use. At this time, however,the City has not created a mixed use ordinance. <br /> The intent is that there could be a combination of both residential and commercial uses on this property. <br /> The surrounding development to the northwest is the Lunds Grocery Store and the next two properties, <br /> which might be part of this development, consist of a bank and dental office. Also in the area are two <br /> properties that have been approved for a senior assisted living facility that were not developed. Gaffron <br /> noted the property in the middle is the only one with a house on it. <br /> The Planning Commission discussed a number of items that would be required, such as a trail easement <br /> along Shadywood Road as well as stormwater and drainage issues that would need to be addressed given <br /> the steep slopes on the lot. There is also a significant amount of woods in the area. The property is <br /> located within the shoreland district,which means it is within 1,000 feet of Lake Minnetonka and is <br /> subject to the shoreland regulations. It is currently designated as Tier 3, which allows 35 percent <br /> hardcover. If it is rezoned to an RPUD,that would revise the hardcover to 50 percent. Gaffron stated <br /> there are wetlands along Kelly Avenue that would need to be taken into account as well as tree impacts. <br /> Gaffron stated, staff would expect the developers to talk with the state historical office to determine if <br /> there are any historic sites on the properties that should be preserved. Some of the slopes on the lot <br /> exceed 30 percent and any development of the site,regardless if it is commercial or residential,would be <br /> subject to the Conservation Design Ordinance, which should be the first step in the process. <br /> Page 5 of 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.