Laserfiche WebLink
' MINUTES OF THE <br /> � ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,August 26,2013 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (9. WETLAND DELINEATIONS CODE INTERPRETATION, Continued) <br /> Struve stated the language in the email is incorrect and that he has clarified the language with BWSR and <br /> Lynda Peterson. Struve noted it is not a city ordinance that the delineations expire after three years but it <br /> is a state law,which was changed from three years to five years. Struve stated the information provided <br /> to Mr. Kinave by the Watershed District earlier this year was incorrect with regard to the wetland <br /> delineation being perpetually given but the information regarding the buffer area is correct. As a building <br /> is built,the buffer line is set based on the delineation at the time and does not move even if the wetland <br /> delineation changes. Based on state law,a wetland delineation is only good for five years. <br /> McMillan stated the other factor is that the City does give variances to wetland setback lines if there is <br /> some type of circumstance where the wetland has grown in size. <br /> Gaffron stated similar to the situation where someone applies for a variance and can demonstrate a <br /> practical difficulty, he does not see a reason why a variance would not be granted. <br /> Kinave asked where the new wetland delineations are for his neighbors that border Willow Road when <br /> the road was reconstructed. Kinave stated it appears there are two sets of standards being applied since <br /> the City did not obtain new wetland delineations on those properties prior to widening Willow Road. <br /> McMillan stated those are usually only requested when someone is requesting to add structure to their <br /> property. <br /> Struve noted the City did conduct wetland delineations in connection with the Willow Drive <br /> reconstruction. Struve indicated there are stipulations with street expansions that allow cities to go <br /> through a bank to mitigate the wetland impacts that the City caused as part of the project. The amount of <br /> hardcover from existing to after is slightly over but it did not change enough to do stormwater treatment <br /> according to the Minnehaha Creek wetland rules. Struve indicated the area drains to the east to Dickey <br /> Lake and that the City did have to go through a banking system for road impacts. <br /> Anderson asked if the water is being diverted to Dickey Lake,whether it would impact these property <br /> owners. <br /> Struve indicated it would not and that the runoff does not drain to the wetlands. <br /> Kanive stated in his view it does not appear to be an equitable situation for the homeowners. <br /> McMillan noted the lakeshore owners have certain restrictions they have to follow and that other property <br /> owners have to deal with the wetland restrictions. McMillan stated Orono has an enormous amount of <br /> wetlands and that it is not a unique thing. <br /> Kanive asked if this constitutes a condemnation or a taking of property. <br /> Mattick stated it does not. <br /> Page 13 of 21 <br />