My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-26-2013 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2013
>
08-26-2013 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2015 2:58:23 PM
Creation date
2/23/2015 2:58:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
' MINUTES OF THE <br /> • ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,August 26,2013 <br /> 7:00 dclock p.m. <br /> (7. #13-362I THOMAS WASMOEN ON BEHALF OF JOHN BESSESEN, 2445,2455, 2465 <br /> SHADYWOOD ROAD, 2560 KELLYAVENUE,AND PID 20-117-23-I1-0032—SKETCH PLAN <br /> REi�IEW, Continued) <br /> Bessesen stated they will have to look at what else can be done with the site but given the price of the <br /> land,they cannot put up one or two single family homes on the property. Bessesen noted Snyder's has <br /> been closed for a long time and that it would be hard to develop a retail development in this area. <br /> McMillan asked what the next step would be if they wanted to look at other ways of developing the <br /> property. <br /> Gaffron stated in his view it would still be a sketch plan review and would entail basically the same <br /> process that has just been gone through. Gaffron stated if they propose something that does not require <br /> rezoning, it would go through the normal process but that the developer should make sure there is some <br /> buy-in by the CiTy before spending a lot of dollars. <br /> Bessesen stated it likely will require a RPUD rather than rezoning if residential is proposed. <br /> McMillan asked if it would have to be rezoned for a RPUD on the commercial property. <br /> Gaffron stated the City has not defined a mixed use ordinance to cover what could be developed on this <br /> site. Anything other than an office or mixed use office would be beyond what is currently in the City's <br /> Comprehensive Plan. <br /> Bessesen commented there is already is a mixed use in this area and that the dentist and bank would like a <br /> new building. <br /> The City Council took no formal action on this item. <br /> *8. #13-3624 PETER JOHNSON ON BEHALF OF WAGENER PROPERTIES,LLC,3165 <br /> NORTH SHORE DRIVE,CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT—RESOLUTION NO.6315 <br /> Anderson moved,Printup seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6315,a Resolution Granting a <br /> Conditional Use Permit Pursuant to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-916,78-966,and 78-1286, <br /> for the Property Located at 3165 North Shore Drive. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> 9. WETLAND DELINEATIONS CODE INTERPRETATION <br /> Gaffron noted at the last City Council meeting during the public comment portion of the meeting Amy <br /> Hubbard raised some questions regarding use of older wetland delineations for determination of wetland <br /> setbacks. In response to those questions, Staff has provided the City Council with some information on <br /> this issue. <br /> Jay Kanive, 950 Willow Drive, stated this is sort of rehashing the issue that was discussed during his <br /> previous application for a sport court but that he would like to comment on the issue. Kanive noted he <br /> sent an email to the Council last night regarding this issue and that he is not as prepared as he would like <br /> to be to speak on the matter since he was not aware this would be an agenda item this evening. <br /> Page 11 of 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.