Laserfiche WebLink
1 r <br /> Council 1995). The intent of this supplement is to bring the Corps Manual up to <br /> date with current knowledge and practice in the region and not to change <br /> wetland boundaries." "...This Regional Supplement is designed for use with the <br /> current version of the Corps Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987) and all <br /> subsequent versions. Where differences in the two documents occur, this <br /> Regional Supplement takes precedence over the Corps Manual for applications <br /> in the Midwest Region." <br /> National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps (Figure 2), Web Soil Survey of Hennepin County map <br /> (Figure 3), Minnesota Public Waters Inventory maps (Figure 4), and 2010 aerial photographs <br /> were reviewed prior to the site visit to identify areas that may be wetlands. Areas illustrating <br /> evidence of wetland conditions were examined in greater detail during the field survey. <br /> Vegetation, soils and hydrology were examined (as outlined in the 1987 Manual) and used to <br /> characterize wetland types and determine wetland boundaries. Sample transects were established <br /> in representative wetland-to-upland transition zones in order to characterize the vegetation, soils, <br /> and hydrology of the site. Transects consist of a representative upland sample point and <br /> representative wetland sample point. Information obtained at the sainple points can be found on <br /> the field data sheets located in the Technical Documents section. <br /> Wetland boundaries were marked at the site by pink "Wetland Delineation" pin flags. The <br /> wetland boundary is considered to be the topographically highest extent of the wetland basin; <br /> areas below the staked boundary met the three required wetland criteria while areas above were <br /> lacking in one or more of these criteria. Wetlands were classified in accordance with methods <br /> described by Cowardin et al. (1979) and used in the NWI (e.g. PEMB, PSS1C, etc.), completed <br /> by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The Circular 39 and Eggers and Reed classification <br /> systems are also given. The indicator status of plants, as described in the Technical Docuinents <br /> section, was determined using the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands — <br /> Region 3 (Sabine 1999). <br /> RESULTS <br /> The National Wetland Inventory indicates the presence of one wetland within the study area <br /> (Figure 2). This wetland was classified as PEMC. <br /> The Web Soil Survey of Hennepin County (Figure 3) identifies one soil map unit present on the <br /> subject property, Crowfork loamy sand. This soil unit is classified as not hydric. Soil series <br /> descriptions are provided in the Technical Documents section. <br /> The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, State Protected Waters Map (Public Water <br /> Inventory) indicates no public waters within the study area(Figure 4). <br /> Site Visit <br /> SER ecologists examined the subject property for areas meeting jurisdictional wetland criteria <br /> Svoboda Ecological Resources 1300 French Creek Drive <br /> Project Number: 2012-014 2 Wayzata MN <br />