My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-22-2013 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
07-22-2013 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2015 2:58:19 PM
Creation date
2/23/2015 2:58:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. , MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,July 22,2013 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (10. CITYLAKE ACCESSES/FIRE LANES, Continued) <br /> Bremer indicated she is aware of a fire lane where the adjoining property owner planted a number of very <br /> small trees just along the fire lane, and when the property was sold not that long ago,the people who <br /> purchased it found out that there lot was not as big as what it appeared to be. Bremer noted the City has <br /> not decided to clean up the trees in that situation. Bremer stated the question then becomes how much <br /> ownership should the City claim over them,which implies that the City would then assume the <br /> responsibility of maintaining them. <br /> Gaffron stated there are one or two fire lanes where they run down the middle of two homes and the <br /> owners of those properties functionally have to utilize the fire lane. Gaffron stated the idea that people <br /> can come through an area that is 15 feet wide between two homes is difficult for the property owners to <br /> accept. <br /> McMillan asked whether something should be included in resolutions when properties abut fire lanes. <br /> Gaffron stated Staff has been looking at that. Gaffron stated when an application was submitted on ivy <br /> Place,the fire lane was looked at and the adjacent property owner was required to remove some of the <br /> items that were placed in the fire lane. Another application on Highwood dealt with the rebuild of a <br /> house, and while there were no private improvements located in the fire lane and it was very obvious that <br /> people have been using the fire lane,the person had questions on how to keep them off their property. In <br /> different situations the City has allowed the property owner to put vegetation or some other demarcation <br /> along the area and in some situations the people maintain the fire lane as yard,which is usually fine with <br /> the City. <br /> Levang stated in her view at the time a survey is required,that would be a good time to mark the area. <br /> Levang commented since each case is unique, a trigger point could perhaps be when a building permit is <br /> applied for. <br /> Gaffron stated that is one time Staff is focusing on and that there have been two or three applications <br /> recently where there have been encroachments into the fire lane. <br /> Anderson asked if the property owners are aware that there is a fire lane when they purchase the property. <br /> Gaffron stated they should be and that the City has sent out notices to the property owners as well as <br /> realtors informing them of the fire lane. <br /> Levang stated that should be an automatic trigger. <br /> Gaffron stated Staff is sometimes not made aware of the property being sold until after the sale is <br /> completed. <br /> Bremer stated quite a bit of this information is public information and that it is not necessarily the City's <br /> responsibility to notify the new property owners of the fire lane. <br /> Page 15 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.