My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-08-2013 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
07-08-2013 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2015 2:58:17 PM
Creation date
2/23/2015 2:58:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
, <br /> MINUTES OF THE ' <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,July 8,2013 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 5. #13-3604 ESKUCHE ASSOCIATES ON BEHALF OF NEIL AND BARBARA <br /> GOODWIN,2975 CASCO POINT ROAD,VARIANCES—PUBLIC AEARING <br /> Curtis stated the applicants are proposing to construct a new residence on the property and are requesting <br /> an average lakeshore setback variance to construct the house as proposed. Also being requested is a <br /> conditional use permit to conduct land alterations within 75 feet of the lake for redesigned stairs, landings <br /> and smaller retaining walls. <br /> At the time of the Planning Commission meeting,the applicants plan exceeded both hardcover and <br /> structural coverage limitations. Since that time the applicants have revised their plan so that both <br /> hardcover and structural coverage levels are met. <br /> The average lakeshore setback line is determined by the location of the homes on the two neighboring <br /> lakeshore lots. The properly immediately to the south of the applicants' property consists solely of a <br /> tennis court and a tall perimeter fence or wall which is situated on or over the applicants' property line. <br /> The same owner also owns the tennis court lot. <br /> The applicants are requesting an average lakeshore setback variance to encroach up to 21 feet into the <br /> setback with portions of the new home. Even with the encroachment,the applicants' proposed plan <br /> appears to improve the views of the lake for the neighbor to the north at 2967 Casco Point Road. Due to <br /> the separation between the two homes and the location of the tennis court,the views of the lake from <br /> 2987 Casco Point Road to the south do not appear to be adversely impacted by the proposed <br /> encroachment. <br /> At the June 17 Planning Commission meeting,there were a number of neighbors who spoke about the <br /> application and specifically discussed storm water issues on Casco Point Road. The applicants' property <br /> exists on a little point on Casco Point Road. Curtis stated approximately two weeks ago she and the City <br /> Engineer and Staff visited the site,along with a representative of the applicant, and the City Engineer <br /> provided some direction regarding grading and drainage. His comments are included in the City <br /> Council's packet. <br /> Curtis noted that the Planning Commission voted 5 to 0 to recommend approval of the variances as <br /> requested contingent upon City Engineer approval of the grading plan and that all storm water and <br /> drainage issues are resolved prior to the issuance of a building permit. The Planning Commission further <br /> recommended that vegetative screening and architectural features be incorporated on the north side of the <br /> garage to break up the massing effects. <br /> Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit and the average lakeshore setback variance <br /> consistent with the Planning Commission's recommendations. Tonight the Council should open the <br /> public hearing and take comments from the applicant and the public and then direct Staff to draft a <br /> resolution reflecting the Council's decision. <br /> Bremer noted she attended the Planning Commission meeting and that the Planning Commission made <br /> some good recommendations for the project. <br /> Printup asked if any additional public comment has been received since the Planning Commission <br /> meeting. <br /> Page 2 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.