Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ' <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,September 23,2013 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (3. #13-3627 RICHARD ETRHEIMAND REBECCA SHABAZ, 2216 SHADYWOOD ROAD, <br /> VARIANCE—RESOL UTION NO. 6323, Contin ued) <br /> Staff recommends approval of the variance application. <br /> Levang noted Exhibit B,Point No. 6, states that the spa would not be set back much further than the deck <br /> of the home to the right,but that when she views the document, it appears that a portion of the spa is in <br /> front of the deck. <br /> Curtis indicated the applicants will need to address that since those are the answers by the applicant to <br /> Staff's questions. <br /> Levang noted she also did not notice any minutes from the Planning Commission and that she was <br /> wondering how they felt about the application. <br /> Curtis stated the item was placed on the Consent Agenda and there was no discussion regarding the <br /> application. <br /> Thiesse stated the rationale for placing it on the Consent Agenda was that the spa would not be visible <br /> from either side by the neighbors and that it seemed to be a reasonable use of the property since it would <br /> not impact the neighbors. <br /> Levang noted Staffls memorandum reads that the spa would not be set back much farther than the deck to <br /> the right. <br /> Thiesse stated it is slightly ahead of it and that the Planning Commission was aware of that. <br /> Levang indicated her point was that the language is not correct. Levang stated she just wanted to make <br /> sure the Planning Commission had responded to Point No. 6. <br /> Anderson moved,Printup seconded,to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6323,a Resolution Granting a <br /> Variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279(6)for the property located at 2216 Shadywood <br /> Road. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> 4. #13-3628 THOMAS POTTER ON BEHALF OF RODNEY AND BARBARA BURWELL, <br /> 1100 MILLSTON ROAD,VARIANCES—RESOLUTION TABLED <br /> Curtis stated the applicant is proposing to construct a 1,664 square foot detached garage which would be <br /> considered a second oversized structure on the property 25 feet from the side lot line where a 30-foot <br /> setback is required. The property also has an approximate 2,100 square foot maintenance garage on the <br /> northwest side of the property. The existing maintenance garage is also considered an oversize accessory <br /> structure. The property also has a 995 square foot pool house and a 240 square foot tennis structure in <br /> addition to the home. The existing smaller detached garage near the home is proposed to be removed as <br /> part of this project. <br /> The Planning Commission placed this item on the Consent Agenda at their September meeting. <br /> Page 2 of 11 <br />