My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-10-2013 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2013
>
06-10-2013 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/19/2015 4:05:05 PM
Creation date
2/19/2015 4:05:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING ' <br /> Tuesday,June 10,2013 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (9. #13-3606 LUKE KUJAWA OF YOUR BOAT CLUB, 1444 SHORELINE DRIVE, CUP <br /> AMENDMENT, Continued) <br /> Gaffron stated the City has taken the position that they do not get very involved in a retail business. How <br /> someone manages a site is critical to the operation of the site and the City has taken an aggressive stance <br /> in how the sites are laid out. The City does have some specific operation standards that are part of the <br /> code that are not well defined, such as properly managing parking and that the lighting should not affect <br /> the neighbors,which are very subjective. <br /> McMillan stated this marina has boat sales,the boat club, and then regular slips. McMillan stated in her <br /> view the parking is a huge issue. <br /> Gaffron commented every one of the marinas is different, and that out of the five that the City has,three <br /> of them have undergone major changes in the last few decades. The ones on North Shore Drive have <br /> changed in small ways but it did not involve a total rebuild. Sailors World and Brown's Bay Marina each <br /> have undergone an extensive site plan review. Gaffron stated if the City Council is looking for details on <br /> the day-to-day operations, Staff has not monitored that and he is not sure how they can. <br /> Printup asked if the storm water and floodplain issues have been explored by Staff. <br /> Gaffron indicated this is the first time he has heard of a stormwater management plan for marinas and that <br /> he is not familiar with what specific regulations Mr.Anderson is referring to since it is not part of the <br /> City's regulations. Gaffron indicated there is a floodplain on that property but that he does not believe <br /> anyone has checked the topography to verify whether the gas tank is located in the floodplain. Gaffron <br /> indicated he can check into that. <br /> McMillan stated the fuel tank and parking are two issues that require additional information. McMillan <br /> noted the City has 15 qualifications for a conditional use permit. McMillan stated in her view Item No. 9 <br /> is not being complied with since there is an adverse impact on the property values in the area given the <br /> deteriorated state of the residential house. In addition,Item No. 11 and Item No. 12 are not being met. <br /> McMillan indicated she is not in a position to intensify the use if the City does not feel there is a solution <br /> to those items. <br /> Bremer stated given the current ownership,this applicant does not have any legal power to improve that <br /> residential location. <br /> Bremer indicated she has seen an improvement in the site over the last year but that her biggest concern is <br /> what the pictures show as an intensification of the parking. Bremer stated she appreciates what the <br /> applicant has said to the Council but the only thing that has changed in the area is that this use has come <br /> into existence and the parking has gotten worse. Bremer stated she is not sure that will be improved by <br /> delaying action on the application. Bremer stated there needs to be better use of the parking lots and that <br /> perhaps the situation might be helped by moving it to the east side. <br /> Bremer stated she doubts that she was the one who said to go forth and prosper and that she likely would <br /> have recommended it be decreased from 30 down to 20,but to the extent the Council would be amenable <br /> to increasing the use at some point in the future, she would suggest that the number be whatever number <br /> is identified as the potential maximum in the area currently being used by the boat club rather than <br /> utilizing slips in a different area. Bremer noted the area in yellow contains 24 spots,which she would not <br /> be opposed to but that the rest of the Council might not be at that point yet. <br /> Page 28 of 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.