My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-10-2013 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
06-10-2013 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/19/2015 4:05:05 PM
Creation date
2/19/2015 4:05:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br /> MINUTES OF TAE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING ' <br /> Tuesday,June 10,2013 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (4. 2012 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT, Continued) <br /> Hoffman stated the first graph depicts the general fund- unreserved/unassigned fund balance for the past <br /> four years. The general fund did decrease by approximately $400,000 in 2012, which was a planned <br /> decrease by the City Council. The second graph depicts the revenue deposited into the general fund over <br /> the same period oftime and reflects approximately a$100,000 decrease in licenses and permits. Hoffman <br /> noted the City's residents did experience some storm damage in 2011 which accounted for the higher <br /> licenses and permit fees. Overall the general fund revenues remained consistent with the prior years. <br /> The third graph reflects the expenditures out of the general fund. Public safety decreased by <br /> approximately$100,000 but otherwise it was very similar to 2011. <br /> Overall there was a decrease in total fund balance,which was largely due to a decrease in the pavement <br /> management fund as a result of some projects undertaken by the City in 2012. As it relates to other <br /> governmental funds not included in the general fund,total revenue was approximately $1.5 million, <br /> which was basically the same as 2011. <br /> Hoffman noted the other fund expenditures for 2012 were $3.3 million as compared to $3.4 million in <br /> 2011. The largest increase in capital outlay expenditures mainly related to the Orono Orchard Road <br /> project and the pavement management fund. This was offset by a significant decrease in debt service <br /> expenditures. Overall the expenditures were very similar to prior years. <br /> As it relates to the enterprise funds, overall there was not a significant change between 2011 and 2012. <br /> Operating income in the water fund did increase slightly from 2011, stormwater remained consistent, and <br /> the sewer fund increased slightly. The main increase for the water fund was a slight increase in user rates � <br /> and usage. <br /> Hoffman stated as it relates to the graph entitled government-wide financial data,this incorporates all of <br /> the other graphs into one graph. The cash line did decrease quite a bit from the prior year but the chart <br /> does not include non-spendable assets, such as infrastructure. Cash reserves decreased but the City's <br /> capital assets increased and were mainly related to some road projects. <br /> Projection of future debt service envisions no additional debt service and is projected to decrease in each <br /> of the next five years assuming no new debt is taken out. <br /> The ta�c rate comparison according to the League of Minnesota Cities shows that the City of Orono is <br /> down around 15 percent,which is the lowest among neighboring communities as well as being <br /> significantly lower than the statewide city average. Orono is included in Region 11 and the graph shows <br /> that Orono is quite low compared to a number of similarly sized cities. <br /> Hoogeveen stated GASB 62 and 63 affected the terminology used in the government-wide and <br /> proprietary fund statements but will have no financial impact on the City. GASB 68 will become <br /> effective in 2015 and will require the City to report a net pension liability for their allocation of the state- <br /> administered pension plans. Hoogeveen noted this requirement is not as significant for a city as it is for a <br /> school district since the city only has PERA. Hoogeveen commented that funding of pensions in <br /> Minnesota is better than other states. <br /> Page 2 of 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.