Laserfiche WebLink
,. MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Tuesday,May 28,2013 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (3. #13-3596 CITY OF ORONO—ACCESSOR Y USES AND STR UCTURES—ZONING <br /> ORDINANCE AMENDMENT, Continued) <br /> Ordinance Section 26 has been further revised to include or remove certain definitions. The current <br /> definition for an accessory use is not changing under the current draft. Accessory use or structure in <br /> today's existing definition is a use or a structure subordinate to and serving the principal use or structure <br /> of the same lot customarily incidental to the principal use or structure. While it has been removed from <br /> this section, it is already listed elsewhere in the code. Gaffron indicated when we talk about having a list <br /> of accessory uses, one of the reasons the City is attempting to create a list of accessory uses is to provide <br /> some clarity to what is intended by the code. Given the fact that Staff understands that the code as it <br /> exists today can be interpreted in ways different than what has been intended, Staff is attempting with the <br /> changes to make a code that is very clear for the public to understand. <br /> After much consideration, Staff has concluded that the existing combined definition of"accessory use or <br /> structure" is appropriate as opposed to separate definitions for"accessory use"and"accessory structure." <br /> Because the current code has multiple definitions, Staff has deleted the existing definition of"accessory <br /> use,"not added a definition of"accessory structure,"retaining the existing definitions of"principal use" <br /> and"secondary use." Also added are the definitions of private recreational sporting facilities and private <br /> recreational play facilities. <br /> Ordinance Section 27 has been added to revise Shoreland Ordinance Section 78-1281 (Water-Oriented <br /> Accessory Structures)to allow flagpoles and small pump houses(no greater than 20 square feet in area <br /> and no higher than 48 inches in height)within the lakeshore setback. As drafted, flagpoles would have to <br /> be set back from the ordinary high water level a distance that is yet to be determined as well as meet the <br /> required principal structure side setback for the zoning district. Setbacks would be no less than the <br /> principal structure setback. In a side yard in the one-half and one acre zones, it would be at least ten feet <br /> from the side lot line; in the 2-acre zone, it would be a 30-foot side setback; and in a 5-acre zone it would <br /> be a 50-foot side setback. <br /> Ordinance Section 28 has also been added to review Shoreland Ordinance Section 78-1279 (placement of <br /> structures on lots)to add flagpoles and pump houses to the short list of structures not required to meet the <br /> average lakeshore setback requirements. Gaffron noted there are a number of existing pump houses <br /> already in existence and the standards have been revised to match those of a lockbox. <br /> Bremer asked why that specification should be included in Section 2 and not in Sections 1 or 3. <br /> Gaffron indicated both a pump house and a lock box are typically at the shoreline or close to the water. A <br /> flagpole could be located close to the shore or elsewhere on the property. Gaffron asked if the Council <br /> would prefer a specific distance from the shore be required for a flagpole. <br /> Bremer stated she does not see the reason for a difference. <br /> Gaffron asked if she is suggesting that there not be a standard for flagpoles in the 0-75 foot zone. <br /> Bremer stated if they were going to do that,then it would not be necessary for Items 1,2, and 3, and that <br /> she does not understand the philosophy for having a different distance for a flagpole. <br /> Page 3 of 18 �_ <br />