My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-13-2013 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
05-13-2013 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/19/2015 4:05:01 PM
Creation date
2/19/2015 4:04:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
' MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> . Monday,May 13,2013 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (8. #13-3596 CITY OF ORONO,ZONING STUDY—ACCESSORY i1SES AND STR UCTURES, <br /> Continued) <br /> The Planning Commission suggested that the accessory use entries for Recreational Facilities should be <br /> split into two categories: those recreational uses that are sporting in nature; i.e.,relatively active in nature <br /> and may have relatively greater neighborhood impacts, as opposed to those that tend to be more passive in <br /> nature and may have lesser neighborhood impacts. <br /> The two categories are listed in the draft as follows: <br /> 1. Private recreational sporting facilities such as swimming pools, basketball hoops,hockey rinks, <br /> tennis courts and sport courts,trampolines, skateboard ramps, batting cages, etc., and other <br /> recreational sporting facilities which are for the convenience and use of the residents of the <br /> property and their guests. <br /> 2. Private recreational and play facilities such as hot tubs and spas, recreational fire rings,patios, <br /> barbecue pits and outdoor kitchens,playhouses and play structures, swing sets, etc., and other <br /> recreational play facilities which are for the convenience and use of the residents of the <br /> property and their guests. <br /> Gaffron noted the City Attorney has suggested that it may be questionable whether there is a significant <br /> difference between the two categories in the context of a general recreational use,but that if the City <br /> wishes to have two categories,the examples of each use should be placed within a definition of the use <br /> and have been revised as follows: <br /> 1. Private recreational sporting facilities which are for the convenience and use of the residents of <br /> the property and their guests. <br /> 2. Private recreational and play facilities which are for the convenience and use of the residents of <br /> the property and their guests. <br /> New Proposed Definitions: <br /> 1. Private recreational sporting facilities means structures and equipment such as swimming pools, <br /> basketball hoops,hockey rinks,tennis courts and sport courts,trampolines, skateboard ramps, <br /> batting cages, etc.,which are used generally for active recreation purposes. <br /> 2. Private recreational and play facilities means structures and equipment such as hot tubs and <br /> spas,recreational fire rings, patios, barbecue pits and outdoor kitchens,playhouses and play <br /> structures, swing sets,etc.,which are used generally for passive recreation purposes. <br /> Staff would note that a potential difference between the two categories would be to establish different <br /> setback requirements. Large pools,tennis courts and sport courts already have a greater setback <br /> requirement than most other recreational facilities. Other sporting facilities that are semi-permanent or <br /> mobile(such as trampolines or skateboard ramps)would potentially not qualify as structures and may <br /> need to be addressed separately if a setback is desired. <br /> Page 9 of 26 __ _ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.