My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-13-2013 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2013
>
05-13-2013 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/19/2015 4:05:01 PM
Creation date
2/19/2015 4:04:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> . Monday,May 13,2013 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (14. LAKEMINNETONKA CONSERVATIONDISTRICT(LMCD) 2014BUDGET, Continued) <br /> There were a series of subcommittee meetings last summer to discuss the program. John Barton,Three <br /> Rivers Park District, and representatives from the Watershed District,the LMA, and the DNR were <br /> actively involved in preparing the vegetation plan. The plan was finalized over a few weeks' time and <br /> then came back to the AIS task force. The plan was presented to the LMCD Board in October. A public <br /> hearing took place in December and the plan was officially adopted by the LMCD Board on March 13`i'. <br /> Nybeck noted the plan contained references to typical money for harvesting budgets and typical money <br /> that would be probably be needed on an annual basis for equipment replacement and harvesting <br /> equipment,as well as partial funding for herbicide treatment, all of which were removed from the plan. <br /> The recommendation was to obtain feedback from the cities through the budget process for 2014. <br /> Nybeck indicated LMCD receives phone calls on bow fishing on Lake Minnetonka every year and at <br /> times the frequency of the phone calls can be heavy. It is very complicated or hard to respond to the <br /> concerns due to the different jurisdictions and ordinances involved. The LMCD elected to explore a <br /> lake-wide ordinance,which was adopted on Apri124 and is now effective. The goal was to improve <br /> communications to the public for those who want to fish as well as the residents. Since there is now a <br /> lake-wide ordinance,the DNR and the Sheriff's Patrol will do the enforcement of it. <br /> LMCD's ordinance is similar to what Orono has currently. Nighttime bow fishing will no longer be <br /> allowed on Lake Minnetonka. In the high traffic areas, such as Cruiser's Cove,restrictions are in place <br /> that only allow bow fishing from a certain time on Friday to a certain time on Saturday from Memorial <br /> Day through Labor Day. The third part of the ordinance is the DNR or local law enforcement has <br /> jurisdiction to act if it is in the best interests of the public peace or safety. The last part of the ordinance <br /> deals with disposal of fish. <br /> As it relates to the budget,Option 1 is a similar budget to what was adopted in 2013. The levy increase is <br /> a 3 percent overall levy increase from 2013 but it will be slightly less than 3 percent for Orono. The levy <br /> varies based off of your percentage of the tax capacity. The 1.3 percent increase in expenditures would <br /> increase it from 581,000 up to 588,000. There is a 25,000 transfer from the administrative reserve fund <br /> for equipment replacement fund and a two percent compensation adjustment is factored in for <br /> contingency. Nybeck stated it is important to keep in mind that simply because there is a two percent <br /> contingency budgeted,that does not mean the board is obligated to provide the two percent. In addition, <br /> there is also $30,000 budgeted for unspecified AIS management and prevention programs. Historically <br /> the LMCD has used that for watercraft inspections. <br /> Option 2 includes some recommendations for milfoil, curly leaf and pond weed. The levy increase under <br /> Option 2 would be 16.6 percent rather than 3 percent. There is a nine percent increase in expenditures, <br /> and that is primarily because of the money being included for herbicide treatments. The differences from <br /> Option 1 are the money for unspecified AIS management and prevention would be reduced from $30,000 <br /> down to $20,000 and $55,000 is proposed for open air and large scale herbicide treatments,which results <br /> in a net increase of$45,000. <br /> Nybeck stated over the years the LMCD has made a concerted effort to keep the levy flat and there has <br /> not been an increase in the levy from 2009 to 2013. The LMCD has attempted to keep the levy down <br /> because of the economic challenge the cities are facing. <br /> Page 23 of 26 �------ -------- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.