My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-13-2013 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
05-13-2013 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/19/2015 4:05:01 PM
Creation date
2/19/2015 4:04:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE • <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,May 13,2013 . <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (8. #13-3596 CITYOFORONO,ZONINGSTUDY—ACCESSORYUSESANDSTRUCTURES, <br /> Continued) <br /> Mattick commented that is where it becomes difficult to define when it gets down to that level of detail. <br /> As it relates to setbacks, it could be similar to the 0-75 foot zone where nothing is allowed, and in other <br /> areas it could be allowed as long as you do not have hardcover issues,height issues, or not closer than 30 <br /> feet to the property line. <br /> Gaffron noted the City has numerous 50-foot lots and people will store boats and other items in that <br /> 30-foot setback because they have no other place to store them. <br /> Printup stated his concern is that you could leave people that own smaller lots essentially no yard. <br /> Printup commented these are items that are common for Minnesota and that it is difficult to tell people <br /> they cannot have them. Printup stated in his view these are a lot of really good solutions in search of big <br /> problems. <br /> Mattick commented this was a difficult issue to address and that other issues kept coming up as Staff <br /> discussed it. Mattick recommended the City Council take a close look at the amendments and to provide <br /> Staff with their feedback. The goal was to have it done by the end of May, which may not be possible, <br /> but it could possibly be done by June. <br /> Printup asked whether the Council could take action on any items right now given the fact that some <br /> residents are impacted by the moratorium. <br /> Mattick stated in his view it would be difficult to act on only one or two sections since there would be <br /> cross-reference issues. <br /> Gaffron asked whether any of the residents that are affected by the moratorium have an expectation that <br /> the City will have this completed by a certain time. <br /> Curtis indicated Staff has been telling those residents that it is the City's intent to have something in place <br /> by sometime this summer. <br /> Gaffron asked how many people have submitted applications that are impacted. <br /> Curtis stated there are a number of people that have called and asked questions and there are perhaps a <br /> half dozen that have met with Staff. <br /> McMillan indicated she likes Medina's code language as it relates to solar and geothermal. <br /> Gaffron stated Staff can add that in if the Council wishes. <br /> Mattick indicated he would also like to see that included. <br /> It was the consensus of the City Council to include Medina's sections on solar and geothermal. <br /> McMillan asked whether flagpoles should be permitted in the 0-75 foot zone as an allowed use. <br /> Page 14 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.