Laserfiche WebLink
, MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> � Monday,June 24,2013 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (4. #13-3607 BILL COFFMAN ON BEHALF OF ERVIN WACHMAN, OUTLOT B, C&D <br /> BAYVIEW FARMS 2"'D—FINAL PLAT"BAYSIDE MEADOWS"—RESOL UTION NO. 6301, <br /> Continued) <br /> Curtis stated the applicant has submitted a plan stating that the developer will remove the buckthorn and <br /> then the responsibility transfers to the homeowners association at some point for additional maintenance <br /> and future removal of any buckthorn in the conservation areas. <br /> Mattick stated there is a provision in the City Code that talks about shade trees planted by a developer in a <br /> subdivision. The code states one tree shall be planted for every 40 feet of frontage along each road unless <br /> the Council, upon recommendation of City Staff, shall grant a waiver. Mattick stated it appears the City <br /> Council can grant a waiver but that he is not sure if there are other provisions tied to this language. <br /> Mattick stated he also has a concern that this is the plan that has been brought to the Planning <br /> Commission,the Planning Commission received public comment on it, and that what is being proposed <br /> tonight is generally what the public is expecting. Mattick noted this issue has not been contemplated in <br /> the report and the reside�ts in the area will have the impression that what is in the plan currently is what is <br /> going to be done. <br /> Mattick stated in his opinion the Council does have the ability to grant a waiver but noted that any <br /> approval at this time would be without any public notification and without review of possible related code <br /> provisions. <br /> Levang asked when construction is expected to commence. <br /> Coffman stated they cannot afford any delays relative to the approval process and that they would like to <br /> start construction right after the 4`h of July weekend. Coffman noted the landscaping would not be going <br /> in until the fall, which would give them some time to work with Staff on that issue. <br /> Mattick noted it would be something that the applicant would have to reapply for to have it reconsidered. <br /> Bremer commented there would likely be a cost savings to the applicant if fewer trees are planted. <br /> Coffman indicated he would be willing to come back with a different tree plan as long as it does not hold <br /> up construction. <br /> Bremer stated she is fine with the plan as proposed but that she would be open to requiring fewer trees. <br /> Irvin Geffre,4655 Bayside Road,pointed out the location of the trees in the conservation easement. The <br /> Wachmans had planted those trees in 1994 when they purchased the property. Geffre stated at the present <br /> time the trees have taken their lake view away and that he would like to see one of those trees removed, <br /> which would fall in line with what the Council would like to see. Geffre stated he would like to see in <br /> any revised plan the removal or relocation of that one tree. Geffre noted Mr. Coffinan has alluded to the <br /> fact that he would be willing to relocate the tree to help open up the view of the lake. <br /> Mattick stated the Council would need the applicant's consent if any trees are going to be removed. <br /> Page 5 of 15 <br />