My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-17-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
10-17-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2016 11:38:52 AM
Creation date
12/1/2016 11:11:07 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
281
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FILE#16-3866 , <br /> October 13,2016 <br /> Page 6 of 6 <br /> 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the setback variances as well as the <br /> hardcover variances, if granted will not alter the essential character of the <br /> neighborhood? <br /> 3. Does Planning Commission find justification for granting hardcover variances for <br /> the reconfigured deck within the 0-75' zone? <br /> 4. If the Planning Commission concludes that the variances as requested or in some <br /> other manner or configuration are justified, does the Commission find it necessary to <br /> impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the <br /> variances? <br /> 5. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> If Planning Commission determines that the practical difficulties test is met and the variances <br /> are justified, then a recommendation for approval of the setback and hardcover variances <br /> inay be in order. If Planning Commission finds that the practical difficulties test is not met for <br /> one or more of the requested variances, a recommendation for denial, partial denial, or tabling <br /> for revisions, may be appropriate. Options for action include: <br /> 1) Recommend approval (with or without specific conditions). <br /> 2) Recommend partial approval (specify) <br /> 3) Recominend denial, stating reasons. <br /> 4) Table for further information or revisions specify what information or changes are <br /> desired. <br /> 5) Other. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.