My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-17-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
10-17-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2016 11:38:52 AM
Creation date
12/1/2016 11:11:07 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
281
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� PC Exhibit B <br /> PRACTICAL DiFFICULTIES D�CUMENTATION FORM <br /> This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application witl not be considered <br /> complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is cQmpiete and submitted to the City. <br /> Minnesota State Statutes Section 462.357, Subdtvision 6(2) requires that practical dlfficulties be demonstrated in <br /> order for a variance to be granted. The difficulties must be unique to the property as variances run witli the land <br /> and not the land owner. Personal and economlc situations are rtot considered valid practical dlfficu/ties. In order <br /> for an application to be heard by the Planning Commfssion and City Council practical difficutties having merit must <br /> be demonstrated. <br /> HOW DO I PROVE A PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY? <br /> This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine ff practical difficu�ies exist and how the <br /> variance wlll affect the surrounding community. To prove practical difflculties, address all the retevant points listed <br /> beiow and answer them as cleariy as possible. <br /> Since you are requesting the code exoeption, you havs the burden of proving that the variance is Justifisd. <br /> The information the City receives is what is used in determining a denial or approval recammendation. ff you leave <br /> something out it will not be considered. <br /> Please address each of the twelve pradicaJ dltnculties crrfena as they relate to the request if they do not apply, <br /> write N/A In fhe space provided: <br /> 1. "The property owner proposes to use the property i reasona�le manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter.' <br /> � � o <br /> 2. 'The plight of the landowner is due to c�umstanc�s u�iq�u�t his property hot created by the landowner.' <br /> -tt� <br /> 3. "The varience, if granted,wil)not atter essential c aracte` r of e locality." <br /> ---- r�c�c h o �� <br /> 4. `Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficultles if reasonable use for the property exists <br /> under the terms of the Zoning Chapter." N /� <br /> 1 <br /> 5. "Practical dffficumes inWude, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy <br /> systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered constnac6on as defined in Minnesota Statutes,Section <br /> 1�6J.06, Subd. 2,when in harmony with this Chapter.' <br /> �-� . <br /> 6. "The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Cauncil may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed <br /> under this Chapter for property in the zone h re the affected person's land is located." <br /> � �' � Z Cl�{ac�.e c' RECEiVLD <br /> SEP-212016 <br /> varrance appllcabon—Mey zole <br /> Page 4 C���ONO <br /> � � � � � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.