My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-11-2013 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
02-11-2013 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/19/2015 3:46:51 PM
Creation date
2/19/2015 3:46:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE - <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING • <br /> Monday,February 11,2013 � <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. � <br /> (6. #12-3582 COLSONCUSTOMHOMES ONBEHALF OFBWB HOLDINGS,LLC, 4731 <br /> NORTH SHORE DRIVE— VARIANCE—RESOL UTION—TABLED, Continued) <br /> 1. The proposed patio to be reoriented so as to not encroach into the 20-foot bluff impact zone. <br /> 2. The proposed deck should be reoriented and/or resized so that there is no more encroachment <br /> into the 30-foot bluff setback than that of the home. <br /> In 2006,the submitted survey contained topographical information that indicated the bluff was 24 feet <br /> from the corner of the proposed home, outside the bluff impact zone,yet within the 30-foot bluff setback. <br /> The top of bluff was missing from the current applicant's initial survey. The applicant has since provided <br /> a revised survey showing the top of bluff to Staff the day of the Planning Commission meeting. The <br /> information reviewed by the Planning Commission at their January meeting was based on the revised <br /> survey dated 1/18/13 depicting a similar top of bluff location as the 2006 survey. The recommendations <br /> made by the Planning Commission were also based on the 1/18/13 survey. Due to the timing,Planning <br /> Staff did not have an opportunity to fully review the 1/18/13 survey. <br /> Following the Planning Commission meeting, Staff reviewed the bluff as shown on the current survey <br /> and disagreed with its depicted location. The topographic information provided on the recent surveys <br /> differs quite a bit from the 2006 survey. For instance,the slope on the western portion of the lot in the <br /> 2006 survey is depicted as 20-25 percent, while the 2013 survey reflects approximately 50 percent slopes <br /> in the same location. <br /> The location ofthe proposed home on the current plan is consistent with the 2006 approved plan. Due to <br /> the other constraints of the property,the proposed location may still be the best option even though the <br /> top of bluff appears to be as close as 12 feet from the proposed home in places. The 30-foot bluff setback <br /> extends halfway through the home. <br /> The Planning Commission's direction at the January meeting was to move the patio out of the 20-foot <br /> bluff impact zone and reorient the deck to encroach no more than the house based on the location of the <br /> top of bluff shown on the 1/18/13 survey. The applicant has provided a plan responding to the direction <br /> on both the patio and deck. The bluff location has also been revised based on the current topographic <br /> information. Staff has reviewed and agees with the top of bluff as shown on the most recent survey <br /> dated 2/1/13. <br /> The revised top of bluff location results in an even more restricted buildable envelop than previously <br /> realized. The applicant's proposed home is generally consistent with the 2006 plans and reflects only an <br /> additional four feet of depth added on to the garage to make it more functional. This results in the 10' x <br /> 13' side proposed setback from the alley. To further push the house away from the bluff results in an <br /> unreasonably small house considering the established driveway location. <br /> The proposed location will result in minor grading within the bluff and bluff impact zone to accommodate <br /> drainage. <br /> Planning Staff has reviewed the revised plans and recommends approval of the variances as requested <br /> consistent with the 2/1/13 survey and revised house plans showing the reoriented deck. <br /> Levang asked if the Planning Commission reviewed the latest surveys. <br /> Page 12 of 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.