My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-11-2013 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
02-11-2013 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/19/2015 3:46:51 PM
Creation date
2/19/2015 3:46:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING • <br /> Monday,February 11,2013 . <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (LMCD REPORT—ANDREW McDERMOTT,REPRESENTATIVE, Continued) <br /> "Jabbour noted the DNR's AIS program is a$3.6 million budget for the entire state of Minnesota." <br /> Printup stated the Council needs to take into consideration the people who do not live on the lake and that <br /> putting that many resources into it is not something he would be comfortable with. <br /> Levang indicated she also is not comfortable with contributing to this. Levang stated she concurs that the <br /> City Council should make a decision and then stand by it. <br /> McMillan commented she also is opposed to the use of chemicals in the lake and that she could never <br /> envision a partnership where certain private individuals receive money in some form for chemical <br /> treatment that has been shown does not kill the milfoil. Even if the lakes are treated,the milfoil will come <br /> back. In addition, the chemicals have to be monitored on a regular basis,which also costs money. <br /> McMillan noted a considerable amount of time and energy will need to be put into the chemical treatment <br /> program, and if the LMCD gets involved in this,there may be no stopping it. <br /> Anderson noted the scope of the service area has grown tremendously from the original intent of the <br /> LMCD. Anderson commented that everyone wants to preserve the lake but that they do not want to keep <br /> throwing chemicals in it year after year. <br /> McMillan stated when they did the pilot program,they were hoping for better results. This project <br /> involves chemicals and lots of money way down the road to simply maintain the status quo. <br /> Bremer stated her personal reasons for being reticent are not monetary based and that the Council may not <br /> have all of the information at this time regarding the true costs of the program over time. Bremer noted <br /> the entire community benefits from Lake Minnetonka to some degree. <br /> Bremer stated her biggest concern is the lack of knowledge that everyone has for determining what the <br /> best way to control this is and that she also has a concern with what has happened in some other bays. <br /> Bremer stated given the state of technology,harvesting and chemical treatment are the only options <br /> available at this point and that she hopes the Council does not foreclose a conversation from happening if <br /> other technology becomes available. <br /> McDermott indicated the LMCD will continue to look at other options and that he would encourage the <br /> City Council to speak to the other cities. <br /> McMillan indicated Staff will put together a letter regarding the Council's stance on this issue. <br /> Nybeck noted the LMCD did hold a public safety meeting regarding vehicles driving on Lake <br /> Minnetonka. <br /> Levang asked what options they are pursuing to keep cars from falling into the lake. <br /> ------ Page 10 of 24 — <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.