Laserfiche WebLink
. <br /> '� � � 53191.1 <br /> TQ: Street File <br /> From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator <br /> Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager <br /> Date: May 31, 1991 <br /> Subject: 2280 French Creek Circle - Septic Problem <br /> Note: This was brought to our attention by Steve Schirmers after <br /> a request came to him from Quickway Excavating to check out <br /> a surface discharge from the mound system on this property. <br /> Symptoms: The mound system was discharging from the rock bed at <br /> the northwesterly corner. Bruce Bren had noted to Quickway <br /> that the discharge to the surface had occurred as early as <br /> February 1991. <br /> Possible Problems: <br /> 1. The pump in the pump tank was set or somehow functioning so <br /> that the volume pumped appears to exceed 400 gallons per <br /> cycle . The water level at pump shut off was at <br /> approximately the base of the pump. The evidence on the <br /> walls on the tank as to the normal pump turr%�elevation was <br /> approximately 2' higher. Steve Shirmers calculated the <br /> drainback should be no more than 30 gallons in the length of <br /> piping between the pump tank and the mound. If the 1, 000 <br /> gallon tank has approximately 19 gallons per vertical inch <br /> capacity, it appears that appr�ximately 400 gallons to 450 <br /> gallons were being pumped into the mound at each cycle. <br /> It was also clear that the single orange float that should <br /> be controlling pump turn-on/turn-off was hanging at its <br /> lowest point and was a foot above the water level, when the <br /> pump was still pumping, hence it is clear that the switch is <br /> not functioning correctly. <br /> 2. In the rockbed of the mound, eff luent discharging from the <br /> �ump station is puddling in the rockbed, and not penetrating <br /> into the sand layer below. Borings in the rockbed indicated <br /> water level at or above the top of the rockbed. Soil <br /> borings 1' outside the rockbed were not saturated and in <br /> fact were only moist to a depth at the bottom of the borings <br /> as much as 2-3' below the rockbed. Clearly, water entering <br /> the rockbed is not entering the sand f or final treatment, or <br /> is only entering the sand at a very slow rate, good for <br /> treatment but hydraulically not accepting the full load. <br />