My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Home occupation complaint
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
F
>
French Creek Circle
>
2280 French Creek Circle - 10-117-23-23-0003
>
Correspondence
>
Home occupation complaint
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 3:21:08 PM
Creation date
11/30/2016 2:06:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
2280
Street Name
French Creek
Street Type
Circle
Address
2280 French Creek Circle
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
1011723230003
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FTC CHARGES MINNESOTA LAW FIRM AND BANK WITH CONSPIRING TO DE... Page 2 of 2 <br /> According to the complaint, in the fall of 1986, Ulrich, with the assistance of the Larkin, Hoffman <br /> firm, allegedly attempted to place a substantial amount of his rare-coin holdings into three identical <br /> trusts the firm had helped him set up for his daughters in 1985. <br /> The complaint states that an attorney at Larkin, Hoffman, worked with Ulrich to devise a plan-- <br /> which included backdating documents and altering them to remove creation-date codes -- to make it <br /> appear as if the coin holdings had been placed in the trusts prior to Ulrich's knowledge of the FTC <br /> investigation. (Had this been the case, the FTC could not have reached the trust- account holdings in <br /> its suit for consumer redress.) <br /> Later, according to the complaint, an attorney at Larkin, Hoffman made numerous false statements <br /> during a deposition and misled the court in an affidavit about when he believed the gifts to the trust <br /> actually had been made. <br /> Further, the complaint states, the National City Bank of Minneapolis allegedly accepted a position in <br /> April 1987 as corporate trustee of Ulrich's trusts despite the objection of several bank employees <br /> who were concerned about Ulrich's legal problems and possible unlawful motives for using the bank <br /> as trustee. <br /> The "gifted" coins then were physically transferred to the National City Bank's vault. Then, the FTC <br /> charged, National City Bank and Ulrich agreed not to liquidate the coins, as required by state law and <br /> federal banking regulations. <br /> From June 1989 until April 1991, the FTC alleged, National City Bank substantially assisted Ulrich <br /> in a scheme to shield assets from the FTC by giving him free rein to control and liquidate the trust <br /> assets as he chose, in violation of the bank's legal responsibilities. The FTC alleged that the bank <br /> appointed Ulrich as its agent to liquidate the coins and allowed him to remove the coins from the <br /> bank's vaults. <br /> The complaint states that, although the coins at issue in these sales were estimated by the bank to be <br /> worth upwards of several million dollars in 1987, the trust accounts received only $266,000 from the <br /> sales. Ulrich allegedly converted approximately $400,000 of the coin sale proceeds to his own use. <br /> Ulrich's free rein over the trust coins continued long after it was clear to National City Bank the <br /> value of the trust assets was being substantially depleted, according to the complaint. <br /> In a separate statement, concurring in part and dissenting in part, Commissioner Deborah K. Owen <br /> stated, "The complaint in this matter pleads four causes of action. Based on the evidence available, I <br /> concur in three counts, and dissent as to the count alleging conspiracy. Because others may review <br /> the Commission's complaint for guidance in their own efforts to comply with the law, I would stress <br /> that the complaint should be read as a whole.... Certain of the individual actions alleged here might <br /> well be consistent with lawful professional conduct, under different circumstances. However, given <br /> the weight of the evidence available, I was persuaded that a complaint with three counts should issue, <br /> based on the totality of the alleged conduct." <br /> Source: http://www.crimes-of-persuasion.com/players/ulrich william.htm <br /> http://coin-fraud-news.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=72:ftc-char... 4/18/2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.