Laserfiche WebLink
FTC CHARGES MINNESOTA LAW FIRM AND BANK WITH CONSPIRING TO DE... Page 2 of 2 <br /> According to the complaint, in the fall of 1986, Ulrich, with the assistance of the Larkin, Hoffman <br /> firm, allegedly attempted to place a substantial amount of his rare-coin holdings into three identical <br /> trusts the firm had helped him set up for his daughters in 1985. <br /> The complaint states that an attorney at Larkin, Hoffman, worked with Ulrich to devise a plan-- <br /> which included backdating documents and altering them to remove creation-date codes -- to make it <br /> appear as if the coin holdings had been placed in the trusts prior to Ulrich's knowledge of the FTC <br /> investigation. (Had this been the case, the FTC could not have reached the trust- account holdings in <br /> its suit for consumer redress.) <br /> Later, according to the complaint, an attorney at Larkin, Hoffman made numerous false statements <br /> during a deposition and misled the court in an affidavit about when he believed the gifts to the trust <br /> actually had been made. <br /> Further, the complaint states, the National City Bank of Minneapolis allegedly accepted a position in <br /> April 1987 as corporate trustee of Ulrich's trusts despite the objection of several bank employees <br /> who were concerned about Ulrich's legal problems and possible unlawful motives for using the bank <br /> as trustee. <br /> The "gifted" coins then were physically transferred to the National City Bank's vault. Then, the FTC <br /> charged, National City Bank and Ulrich agreed not to liquidate the coins, as required by state law and <br /> federal banking regulations. <br /> From June 1989 until April 1991, the FTC alleged, National City Bank substantially assisted Ulrich <br /> in a scheme to shield assets from the FTC by giving him free rein to control and liquidate the trust <br /> assets as he chose, in violation of the bank's legal responsibilities. The FTC alleged that the bank <br /> appointed Ulrich as its agent to liquidate the coins and allowed him to remove the coins from the <br /> bank's vaults. <br /> The complaint states that, although the coins at issue in these sales were estimated by the bank to be <br /> worth upwards of several million dollars in 1987, the trust accounts received only $266,000 from the <br /> sales. Ulrich allegedly converted approximately $400,000 of the coin sale proceeds to his own use. <br /> Ulrich's free rein over the trust coins continued long after it was clear to National City Bank the <br /> value of the trust assets was being substantially depleted, according to the complaint. <br /> In a separate statement, concurring in part and dissenting in part, Commissioner Deborah K. Owen <br /> stated, "The complaint in this matter pleads four causes of action. Based on the evidence available, I <br /> concur in three counts, and dissent as to the count alleging conspiracy. Because others may review <br /> the Commission's complaint for guidance in their own efforts to comply with the law, I would stress <br /> that the complaint should be read as a whole.... Certain of the individual actions alleged here might <br /> well be consistent with lawful professional conduct, under different circumstances. However, given <br /> the weight of the evidence available, I was persuaded that a complaint with three counts should issue, <br /> based on the totality of the alleged conduct." <br /> Source: http://www.crimes-of-persuasion.com/players/ulrich william.htm <br /> http://coin-fraud-news.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=72:ftc-char... 4/18/2013 <br />