Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE � <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,October 8,2012 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> *12. PAY REQUEST NO 1—2012 ORONO STREET MAINTENANCE PROJECT <br /> Bremer moved,Franchot seconded,to approve Pay Request No. 1 for the contractor CS <br /> McCrossan Construction,Inc.,in the amount of$112,603.97 for the 2012 street maintenance <br /> project. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> a <br /> MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT <br /> Printup stated he has gotten some positive feedback regarding the blast e-mail crime alerts. Printup stated <br /> he is aware of two other local communities that have a similar program. Printup commented the more <br /> vigilance there is and the more eyes that are looking out for questionable activity is a benefit for the entire <br /> community and reassures people that it is okay to ca11911. <br /> Printup noted the Long Lake Fire Department is having an open house next weekend. <br /> Printup thanked Staff for arranging the Crystal Bay Park dedication. <br /> Franchot reported the LMCC had a very useful meeting with various city representatives relating to the <br /> needs assessment. Mike Gaffron was able to attend the meeting for Orono. The meeting is available on <br /> DVD and he indicated he would arrange to have copies sent to the City and each of the council members. <br /> McMillan noted the fall newsletter will be coming out in the next week or so and that it will contain the <br /> new city logo. The designer of the logo has been asked to attend the December 10`�Council meeting so <br /> he can be formally recognized. McMillan noted she sent him a copy of the tea�t that will appear in <br /> Orono's newsletter. <br /> McMillan reported she received an e-mail from a resident on Shadywood Road that lives close to the <br /> Klinglehutz properiy. McMillan indicated that project was approved approximately a year ago and that <br /> the neighbor was worried about the brush pile on the property. The developer has indicated that will be <br /> removed by the end of the month. <br /> Curtis stated a letter has been sent to the property owner asking them to remove the brush. <br /> McMillan asked when developers are undercapitalized,what recourse the City has if certain work has to <br /> be performed by the City. <br /> Mattick stated funding was an issue with the property and that the City was not able to obtain a letter of <br /> credit. Staff did work out an alternate security agreement which gives the City access to their financing if <br /> necessary to secure the improvements. Mattick stated to his understanding the CiTy did not release the <br /> mylar. <br /> Gaffron noted their approvals expired some time ago. Staff did ask them what their intent was with the <br /> clear cutting and the developer had indicated they would not be doing any further work. Staff has not <br /> heard anything from them since then. <br /> Mattick stated they do not have the right to do anything on the property since their approvals have <br /> expired. <br /> Page 16 of 21 <br />