Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING - <br /> Monday,September 24,2012 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (4. ROOSTERS-POTENTIAL ANIMAL ORDINANCE AMENDMENT, Continued) <br /> Mattick noted he is not familiar with this litigation but that if the City Council is opposed to roosters, <br /> Staff s recommendation would be the best way to deal with the situation. Mattick noted if the City <br /> proceeds under the noise violation regulations,the City is required to prove that a nuisance exists. <br /> Franchot asked if roosters are necessary for chickens to lay eggs. <br /> Gaffron indicated roosters are not required for chickens to produce eggs but they are required to make <br /> baby chicks. <br /> Franchot reiterated he would be in favor of adopting the proposed amendment if the litigation does not <br /> solve the problem. <br /> Mayor McMillan asked what other recourse the neighbors would have to deal with the crowing. <br /> Mattick stated the City needs to demonstrate to the judge and/or jury that the crowing is loud and <br /> obtrusive, which can be done by having a police officer visit the site and observing the situation. Mattick <br /> noted that it can be difficult to prove it is a nuisance and that sometimes it comes down to the time at <br /> which the noise is repeatedly occurring. <br /> Mayor McMillan stated given Staffs memo, she would be okay with following Staffs recommendation of <br /> waiting to see if the situation will be resolved in the court system. McMillan indicated she would be <br /> agreeable to reviewing this situation in a few months to see whether any further action should be taken. <br /> Bremer stated she is also agreeable with waiting, but noted the big difference between crowing roosters <br /> and barking dogs is that the dogs can be placed indoors if they are bazking but that the same is not true for <br /> roosters. Bremer indicated she does not know what else can be done to help quiet roosters and that it <br /> appears there are two movements; one that prohibits roosters completely and another that allows roosters <br /> to a limited extent. Bremer stated if the rest of the City Council is interested in banning roosters, she <br /> would also be in favor of banning roosters. <br /> Bremer asked when the litigation is expected to be concluded. <br /> Laura Shatzer stated they have their arraignment in a couple of days. <br /> Mattick noted the arraignment is the first step in the process and that it could be a few months before it <br /> works its way through the court system. <br /> Shatzer stated given the time and expense that the City has gone through already in dealing with this <br /> situation, she would like to see something enacted that would give the City more authority to prevent <br /> similar situations from occurring. <br /> McMillan asked if the situation would be different if there was only one rooster. <br /> Shatzer commented she is unsure of that, and noted that there are between five to ten roosters at any one <br /> time on the property. Currently the neighbor has two or three roosters,which has improved the situation <br /> slightly. <br /> Page 8 of 12 <br />